1999PubMedRequires access

Usefulness of dental implants in maxillofacial reconstruction.

Minoru Ueda, Yo Hibino, A Niimi

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Fabricating maxillofacial prosthesis can be challenging. Placement of implants can have a dramatic effect on the stability and retention of the prosthesis in patients. This article provides clinical retrospective analysis of osseointegrated implants used for maxillofacial reconstruction. Patient charts and radiographs were reviewed to determine implant status, stability of prosthesis, and masticatory and speech function. Of the 104 implants placed, there were 4 implant failures. The overall survival rate for implants in this patient population was 96.1%. The stability of maxillofacial prostheses demonstrated significant improvement after anchorage to implants. Implant-borne maxillofacial prostheses are better stabilized and retained than non-implant-borne prostheses, providing an improved quality of life to patients requiring prosthesis rehabilitation of maxillofacial defects.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Fabricating maxillofacial prosthesis can be challenging. Placement of implants can have a dramatic effect on the stability and retention of the prosthesis in patients. This article provides clinical retrospective analysis of osseointegrated implants used for maxillofacial reconstruction. Patient charts and radiographs were reviewed to determine implant status, stability of prosthesis, and masticatory and speech function. Of the 104 implants placed, there were 4 implant failures. The overall survival rate for implants in this patient population was 96.1%. The stability of maxillofacial prostheses demonstrated significant improvement after anchorage to implants. Implant-borne maxillofacial prostheses are better stabilized and retained than non-implant-borne prostheses, providing an improved quality of life to patients requiring prosthesis rehabilitation of maxillofacial defects.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Fabricating maxillofacial prosthesis can be challenging. Placement of implants can have a dramatic effect on the stability and retention of the prosthesis in patients. This article provides clinical retrospective analysis of osseointegrated implants used for maxillofacial reconstruction. Patient charts and radiographs were reviewed to determine implant status, stability of prosthesis, and masticatory and speech function. Of the 104 implants placed, there were 4 implant failures. The overall survival rate for implants in this patient population was 96.1%. The stability of maxillofacial prostheses demonstrated significant improvement after anchorage to implants. Implant-borne maxillofacial prostheses are better stabilized and retained than non-implant-borne prostheses, providing an improved quality of life to patients requiring prosthesis rehabilitation of maxillofacial defects.

Key concepts: Osseointegration, Prosthesis, Dentistry, Masticatory force, Medicine, Implant, Dental prosthesis, Orthodontics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Usefulness of dental implants in maxillofacial reconstruction. — Research Paper | ScholarLens