1993PubMedRequires access

[Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: significance of blood pressure variability for progression of heart hypertrophy].

Thomas Machnig, G Engels, Henneke Kh, J. Gellert, K. Bachmann

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

It is known that ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring gives a better prediction of target organ damage and prognosis than clinical blood pressure. Many studies have found a closer correlation for ambulatory blood pressure with left ventricular hypertrophy than clinical blood pressure. One question that is discussed controversely is whether the variability of blood pressure is also a determinant of target organ damage independent of the average level. In 52 patients with elevated casual blood pressure a 24-h ambulatory blood-pressure measurement (Space Labs 90202) was performed and left ventricular hypertrophy was evaluated by M-mode echocardiography. The following parameters of blood pressure variability were calculated from the profiles: the standard deviation of the mean value, the variation coefficient and the parameter of variability as proposed by Schächinger et al. Furthermore a Fourier analysis of the blood pressure data was performed to quantify blood pressure variability. We found no statistically significant correlation between blood pressure variability and left ventricular mass. However, systolic and diastolic blood pressure level showed a significant correlation with left ventricular hypertrophy (r = 0.45 and r = 0.49, p < 0.05). Thus, blood pressure variability as calculated from the ambulatory, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring is a poor predictor for secondary damage of the heart.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is known that ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring gives a better prediction of target organ damage and prognosis than clinical blood pressure. Many studies have found a closer correlation for ambulatory blood pressure with left ventricular hypertrophy than clinical blood pressure. One question that is discussed controversely is whether the variability of blood pressure is also a determinant of target organ damage independent of the average level. In 52 patients with elevated casual blood pressure a 24-h ambulatory blood-pressure measurement (Space Labs 90202) was performed and left ventricular hypertrophy was evaluated by M-mode echocardiography. The following parameters of blood pressure variability were calculated from the profiles: the standard deviation of the mean value, the variation coefficient and the parameter of variability as proposed by Schächinger et al. Furthermore a Fourier analysis of the blood pressure data was performed to quantify blood pressure variability. We found no statistically significant correlation between blood pressure variability and left ventricular mass. However, systolic and diastolic blood pressure level showed a significant correlation with left ventricular hypertrophy (r = 0.45 and r = 0.49, p < 0.05). Thus, blood pressure variability as calculated from the ambulatory, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring is a poor predictor for secondary damage of the heart.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is known that ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring gives a better prediction of target organ damage and prognosis than clinical blood pressure. Many studies have found a closer correlation for ambulatory blood pressure with left ventricular hypertrophy than clinical blood pressure. One question that is discussed controversely is whether the variability of blood pressure is also a determinant of target organ damage independent of the average level. In 52 patients with elevated casual blood pressure a 24-h ambulatory blood-pressure measurement (Space Labs 90202) was performed and left ventricular hypertrophy was evaluated by M-mode echocardiography. The following parameters of blood pressure variability were calculated from the profiles: the standard deviation of the mean value, the variation coefficient and the parameter of variability as proposed by Schächinger et al. Furthermore a Fourier analysis of the blood pressure data was performed to quantify blood pressure variability. We found no statistically significant correlation between blood pressure variability and left ventricular mass. However, systolic and diastolic blood pressure level showed a significant correlation with left ventricular hypertrophy (r = 0.45 and r = 0.49, p < 0.05). Thus, blood pressure variability as calculated from the ambulatory, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring is a poor predictor for secondary damage of the heart.

Key concepts: Medicine, Blood pressure, Ambulatory blood pressure, Cardiology, Left ventricular hypertrophy, Internal medicine, Prehypertension, Diastole

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: significance of blood pressure variability for progression of heart hypertrophy]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens