2003PubMedRequires access

[Venous reflux: Measurement variability due to positional differences].

Kamran Mahmutyazıcıoğlu, Sadi Gündoğdu, Hüseyin Özdemir, Ahmet Savranlar, Kıyasettin Asil

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of the subject's position and two different maneuvers in the reflux measurements in femoral veins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Venous reflux times in the common femoral vein (CFV) and superficial femoral vein (SFV) were studied in 50 healthy subjects (25 women, 25 male) aged between 22-57 years-old while the subjects were in supine and standing positions. Reflux was provocated only by Valsalva maneuver (VM) when the subject was lying down, whereas it was provocated by (1) Valsalva maneuver and (2) compression and release maneuver, respectively, when the subject was standing. Reflux times were recorded with each of the three methods. RESULTS: Regarding CFV, a reflux time of 1 second or more was recorded in 29 limbs (29%) only in the supine position. Of these 29 measurements, 19 were between 1 and 1.9 sec and 8 between 2 and 2.9 sec. When the subjects were examined in the standing position, the prevalence of reflux lasting more than 1 sec substantially decreased (5%). The prevalence of reflux lasting less than 0.5 sec was 97% with standing compression maneuver, 84% with standing VM and 27% with supine VM. Similarly, prevalence of reflux of longer than 0.5 sec or 1 sec was lower in the standing position than in the supine position in SFV. In CFV, mean reflux time was 1.3 sec in the supine position, whereas it was 0.7 sec and 0.4 sec with standing compression and standing Valsalva maneuvers, respectively. Corresponding values in SFV were 0.5 sec, 0.3 sec and 0.2 sec, respectively. CONCLUSION: The probability of making a false positive diagnosis of pathological reflux is high with supine examinations. When an examination in the supine position reveals a reflux time of longer than 1 second, making the patient stand up is expected to yield more reliable results. Compression and release maneuver, with its lowest false positive reflux prevalence, is the most reliable method in the evaluation of venous insufficiency.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of the subject's position and two different maneuvers in the reflux measurements in femoral veins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Venous reflux times in the common femoral vein (CFV) and superficial femoral vein (SFV) were studied in 50 healthy subjects (25 women, 25 male) aged between 22-57 years-old while the subjects were in supine and standing positions. Reflux was provocated only by Valsalva maneuver (VM) when the subject was lying down, whereas it was provocated by (1) Valsalva maneuver and (2) compression and release maneuver, respectively, when the subject was standing. Reflux times were recorded with each of the three methods. RESULTS: Regarding CFV, a reflux time of 1 second or more was recorded in 29 limbs (29%) only in the supine position. Of these 29 measurements, 19 were between 1 and 1.9 sec and 8 between 2 and 2.9 sec. When the subjects were examined in the standing position, the prevalence of reflux lasting more than 1 sec substantially decreased (5%). The prevalence of reflux lasting less than 0.5 sec was 97% with standing compression maneuver, 84% with standing VM and 27% with supine VM. Similarly, prevalence of reflux of longer than 0.5 sec or 1 sec was lower in the standing position than in the supine position in SFV. In CFV, mean reflux time was 1.3 sec in the supine position, whereas it was 0.7 sec and 0.4 sec with standing compression and standing Valsalva maneuvers, respectively. Corresponding values in SFV were 0.5 sec, 0.3 sec and 0.2 sec, respectively. CONCLUSION: The probability of making a false positive diagnosis of pathological reflux is high with supine examinations. When an examination in the supine position reveals a reflux time of longer than 1 second, making the patient stand up is expected to yield more reliable results. Compression and release maneuver, with its lowest false positive reflux prevalence, is the most reliable method in the evaluation of venous insufficiency.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of the subject's position and two different maneuvers in the reflux measurements in femoral veins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Venous reflux times in the common femoral vein (CFV) and superficial femoral vein (SFV) were studied in 50 healthy subjects (25 women, 25 male) aged between 22-57 years-old while the subjects were in supine and standing positions. Reflux was provocated only by Valsalva maneuver (VM) when the subject was lying down, whereas it was provocated by (1) Valsalva maneuver and (2) compression and release maneuver, respectively, when the subject was standing. Reflux times were recorded with each of the three methods. RESULTS: Regarding CFV, a reflux time of 1 second or more was recorded in 29 limbs (29%) only in the supine position. Of these 29 measurements, 19 were between 1 and 1.9 sec and 8 between 2 and 2.9 sec. When the subjects were examined in the standing position, the prevalence of reflux lasting more than 1 sec substantially decreased (5%). The prevalence of reflux lasting less than 0.5 sec was 97% with standing compression maneuver, 84% with standing VM and 27% with supine VM. Similarly, prevalence of reflux of longer than 0.5 sec or 1 sec was lower in the standing position than in the supine position in SFV. In CFV, mean reflux time was 1.3 sec in the supine position, whereas it was 0.7 sec and 0.4 sec with standing compression and standing Valsalva maneuvers, respectively. Corresponding values in SFV were 0.5 sec, 0.3 sec and 0.2 sec, respectively. CONCLUSION: The probability of making a false positive diagnosis of pathological reflux is high with supine examinations. When an examination in the supine position reveals a reflux time of longer than 1 second, making the patient stand up is expected to yield more reliable results. Compression and release maneuver, with its lowest false positive reflux prevalence, is the most reliable method in the evaluation of venous insufficiency.

Key concepts: Supine position, Reflux, Valsalva maneuver, Medicine, Internal medicine, Blood pressure, Disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Venous reflux: Measurement variability due to positional differences]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens