Descending phlebography: a comparison of three methods and an assessment of the normal range of deep vein reflux.
Thomas Ml, Keeling Fp, Ackroyd Js
Abstract
Thomas Ml, Keeling Fp, Ackroyd Js
Abstract
Twenty-three legs in 13 patients without evidence of deep vein disease have been examined by descending phlebography using 3 techniques: with the patient semi-erect with no Valsalva manoeuvre with the patient semi-erect with a controlled Valsalva manoeuvre and with the patient supine with a standard Valsalva manoeuvre. It is concluded that the examination performed with the patient supine, using a standard Valsalva manoeuvre, is the most convenient and easiest to interpret of the variation. It is also suggested that deep vein reflux up to Grade 2 is within the normal range.
OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Twenty-three legs in 13 patients without evidence of deep vein disease have been examined by descending phlebography using 3 techniques: with the patient semi-erect with no Valsalva manoeuvre with the patient semi-erect with a controlled Valsalva manoeuvre and with the patient supine with a standard Valsalva manoeuvre. It is concluded that the examination performed with the patient supine, using a standard Valsalva manoeuvre, is the most convenient and easiest to interpret of the variation. It is also suggested that deep vein reflux up to Grade 2 is within the normal range.
Key concepts: Medicine, Supine position, Valsalva maneuver, Reflux, Vein, Gold standard (test), Radiology, Surgery