1986PubMedRequires access

Descending phlebography: a comparison of three methods and an assessment of the normal range of deep vein reflux.

Thomas Ml, Keeling Fp, Ackroyd Js

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

Twenty-three legs in 13 patients without evidence of deep vein disease have been examined by descending phlebography using 3 techniques: with the patient semi-erect with no Valsalva manoeuvre with the patient semi-erect with a controlled Valsalva manoeuvre and with the patient supine with a standard Valsalva manoeuvre. It is concluded that the examination performed with the patient supine, using a standard Valsalva manoeuvre, is the most convenient and easiest to interpret of the variation. It is also suggested that deep vein reflux up to Grade 2 is within the normal range.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Twenty-three legs in 13 patients without evidence of deep vein disease have been examined by descending phlebography using 3 techniques: with the patient semi-erect with no Valsalva manoeuvre with the patient semi-erect with a controlled Valsalva manoeuvre and with the patient supine with a standard Valsalva manoeuvre. It is concluded that the examination performed with the patient supine, using a standard Valsalva manoeuvre, is the most convenient and easiest to interpret of the variation. It is also suggested that deep vein reflux up to Grade 2 is within the normal range.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Twenty-three legs in 13 patients without evidence of deep vein disease have been examined by descending phlebography using 3 techniques: with the patient semi-erect with no Valsalva manoeuvre with the patient semi-erect with a controlled Valsalva manoeuvre and with the patient supine with a standard Valsalva manoeuvre. It is concluded that the examination performed with the patient supine, using a standard Valsalva manoeuvre, is the most convenient and easiest to interpret of the variation. It is also suggested that deep vein reflux up to Grade 2 is within the normal range.

Key concepts: Medicine, Supine position, Valsalva maneuver, Reflux, Vein, Gold standard (test), Radiology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Descending phlebography: a comparison of three methods and an assessment of the normal range of deep vein reflux. — Research Paper | ScholarLens