1996Cerebrovascular DiseasesRequires access

The Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography in the Assessment of Extracranial Carotid Artery Occlusive Disease

Christopher Levi, A. Mitchell, Gregory Fitt, Geoffrey A. Donnan

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

The accuracy of two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in judging diameter narrowing of the extracranial carotid artery was studied using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard. Particular attention was paid to the specificity of the technique for 70–90% diameter stenoses. MRA and DSA examinations of 90 cervical carotid arteries were graded independently by 2 blinded readers. The examinations were compared in the categories 0–29, 30–69, 70–99 and 100% diameter narrowing (NASCET measurements). Overestimation of the degree of stenosis measured angiographically resulted in MRA sensitivity estimates of 77.8% for 0–29% angiographic stenosis and 31% for 30–69% angiographic stenosis. In the 70–99% stenosis group a false-positive rate of 21.9% resulted in 22 of 42 arteries being inappropriately placed in the high-grade stenosis group. In cases of 100% occlusion there was a false-negative rate of 35.7% (5 of 14 cases). MRA is reliable as a screening test for extracranial carotid occlusive disease. Limited ability of the technique to distinguish between ''surgical'' and ''non-surgical'' disease with inappropriate inclusion of some patients as potential surgical candidates limits its application as a single definitive pre-operative test.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The accuracy of two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in judging diameter narrowing of the extracranial carotid artery was studied using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard. Particular attention was paid to the specificity of the technique for 70–90% diameter stenoses. MRA and DSA examinations of 90 cervical carotid arteries were graded independently by 2 blinded readers. The examinations were compared in the categories 0–29, 30–69, 70–99 and 100% diameter narrowing (NASCET measurements). Overestimation of the degree of stenosis measured angiographically resulted in MRA sensitivity estimates of 77.8% for 0–29% angiographic stenosis and 31% for 30–69% angiographic stenosis. In the 70–99% stenosis group a false-positive rate of 21.9% resulted in 22 of 42 arteries being inappropriately placed in the high-grade stenosis group. In cases of 100% occlusion there was a false-negative rate of 35.7% (5 of 14 cases). MRA is reliable as a screening test for extracranial carotid occlusive disease. Limited ability of the technique to distinguish between ''surgical'' and ''non-surgical'' disease with inappropriate inclusion of some patients as potential surgical candidates limits its application as a single definitive pre-operative test.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The accuracy of two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in judging diameter narrowing of the extracranial carotid artery was studied using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard. Particular attention was paid to the specificity of the technique for 70–90% diameter stenoses. MRA and DSA examinations of 90 cervical carotid arteries were graded independently by 2 blinded readers. The examinations were compared in the categories 0–29, 30–69, 70–99 and 100% diameter narrowing (NASCET measurements). Overestimation of the degree of stenosis measured angiographically resulted in MRA sensitivity estimates of 77.8% for 0–29% angiographic stenosis and 31% for 30–69% angiographic stenosis. In the 70–99% stenosis group a false-positive rate of 21.9% resulted in 22 of 42 arteries being inappropriately placed in the high-grade stenosis group. In cases of 100% occlusion there was a false-negative rate of 35.7% (5 of 14 cases). MRA is reliable as a screening test for extracranial carotid occlusive disease. Limited ability of the technique to distinguish between ''surgical'' and ''non-surgical'' disease with inappropriate inclusion of some patients as potential surgical candidates limits its application as a single definitive pre-operative test.

Key concepts: Medicine, Stenosis, Digital subtraction angiography, Radiology, Magnetic resonance angiography, Gold standard (test), Occlusion, Angiography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography in the Assessment of Extracranial Carotid Artery Occlusive Disease — Research Paper | ScholarLens