1980•Tumori JournalRequires access

The Diagnostic Efficacy of Mammography and Palpation in Early Detection of Breast Cancer

Marco Rosselli Del Turco, Gianfranco Giannardi, Natale Villari

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

The diagnostic efficacy of mammography and physical examination, separately and considered together, are evaluated in 912 cases of breast cancer detected at the Center for Social Diseases of the Florence District, where there is a mass-screening program (110 cases) and a diagnostic service for self-referred women (810 cases). The overall sensitivity of the 2 methods increases with age; the trends of diagnostic efficacies of mammography and palpation according to age are similar, except in the 40-44 year age group, in which physical examination has a lower percentage of false-negative cases. In the screening group, there is a greater proportion of nonpalpable cancers and mammography has a larger diagnostic efficacy except in the 40-44 year age group. These results agree with the better sensitivity of mammography in smaller lesion (TI) and with the larger proportion of noninterpretable mammographies in younger women, because of the density of mammalian glands.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The diagnostic efficacy of mammography and physical examination, separately and considered together, are evaluated in 912 cases of breast cancer detected at the Center for Social Diseases of the Florence District, where there is a mass-screening program (110 cases) and a diagnostic service for self-referred women (810 cases). The overall sensitivity of the 2 methods increases with age; the trends of diagnostic efficacies of mammography and palpation according to age are similar, except in the 40-44 year age group, in which physical examination has a lower percentage of false-negative cases. In the screening group, there is a greater proportion of nonpalpable cancers and mammography has a larger diagnostic efficacy except in the 40-44 year age group. These results agree with the better sensitivity of mammography in smaller lesion (TI) and with the larger proportion of noninterpretable mammographies in younger women, because of the density of mammalian glands.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The diagnostic efficacy of mammography and physical examination, separately and considered together, are evaluated in 912 cases of breast cancer detected at the Center for Social Diseases of the Florence District, where there is a mass-screening program (110 cases) and a diagnostic service for self-referred women (810 cases). The overall sensitivity of the 2 methods increases with age; the trends of diagnostic efficacies of mammography and palpation according to age are similar, except in the 40-44 year age group, in which physical examination has a lower percentage of false-negative cases. In the screening group, there is a greater proportion of nonpalpable cancers and mammography has a larger diagnostic efficacy except in the 40-44 year age group. These results agree with the better sensitivity of mammography in smaller lesion (TI) and with the larger proportion of noninterpretable mammographies in younger women, because of the density of mammalian glands.

Key concepts: Palpation, Mammography, Medicine, Breast cancer, Physical examination, Radiology, Breast cancer screening, Cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Diagnostic Efficacy of Mammography and Palpation in Early Detection of Breast Cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens