2000Chinese Journal of Clinkal Oncology and RehabilitationRequires access

The divergence among physical palpation,mammography and ultrasonography in measuring the size of breast tumor

Zhao Bu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

? Objective To compared the divergence among physical palpation,mammography and ultrasonography.Methods 155 single breast tumors from September 1997 to February 1999 were analysed,including 30 benign cases and 125 malignant cases.Measuring the largest diameter of the three different methods and comparing to the largest diameter of pathology.Results The largest diameter of pathology was 0.5~8cm (mean 2.7cm),of physical palpation was 1.0~12cm (mean 3.7cm),of mammography was 0.5~7cm (mean 2.9cm) and 0.5~4cm (mean 2.4cm) of ultrasonography.The highest correlation coefficient(r=0.93)and the smallest standard error (0.21) were obtained in mammography.Conclusions There are different degree divergences between pathological examination and other measuring methods,among them the mammography is the most accurate. 〔

About this research paper

What this paper is about

? Objective To compared the divergence among physical palpation,mammography and ultrasonography.Methods 155 single breast tumors from September 1997 to February 1999 were analysed,including 30 benign cases and 125 malignant cases.Measuring the largest diameter of the three different methods and comparing to the largest diameter of pathology.Results The largest diameter of pathology was 0.5~8cm (mean 2.7cm),of physical palpation was 1.0~12cm (mean 3.7cm),of mammography was 0.5~7cm (mean 2.9cm) and 0.5~4cm (mean 2.4cm) of ultrasonography.The highest correlation coefficient(r=0.93)and the smallest standard error (0.21) were obtained in mammography.Conclusions There are different degree divergences between pathological examination and other measuring methods,among them the mammography is the most accurate. 〔

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

? Objective To compared the divergence among physical palpation,mammography and ultrasonography.Methods 155 single breast tumors from September 1997 to February 1999 were analysed,including 30 benign cases and 125 malignant cases.Measuring the largest diameter of the three different methods and comparing to the largest diameter of pathology.Results The largest diameter of pathology was 0.5~8cm (mean 2.7cm),of physical palpation was 1.0~12cm (mean 3.7cm),of mammography was 0.5~7cm (mean 2.9cm) and 0.5~4cm (mean 2.4cm) of ultrasonography.The highest correlation coefficient(r=0.93)and the smallest standard error (0.21) were obtained in mammography.Conclusions There are different degree divergences between pathological examination and other measuring methods,among them the mammography is the most accurate. 〔

Key concepts: Palpation, Mammography, Medicine, Ultrasonography, Pathological, Radiology, Physical examination, Breast tumor

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The divergence among physical palpation,mammography and ultrasonography in measuring the size of breast tumor — Research Paper | ScholarLens