2010PubMedRequires access

[The effectiveness of asymmetric extraction in treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions].

Wei Chen, Rong-jing Chen, Xiaogang Pan, Quan Yu, Zhengqing Hu, Gang Shen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze hard and soft tissue profile changes before and after asymmetric extraction treatment of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion. METHODS: Thirty patients of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions (11 males, 19 females, average age 13.6 years) were divided into two groups according to their extraction approach. In asymmetric extraction group, 2 first maxillary premolars and 1 first mandibular premolar were extracted. In the control group, all 4 first premolars were extracted. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatment to compare hard and soft-tissue changes between the two groups, and the cephalometric measurements were analysed by SAS6.12 software package for independent sample t test. RESULTS: In comparison of the changes between the two groups, significant differences in dentoskeletal measurements were observed with NAPog, SNA, ANB, MP-SN and with the inclinations of the upper and lower incisors (P<0.01). Significant differences in soft-tissue changes were also observed in the thickness of upper lip, the Z angle (P<0.01) and the nasolabial angle (P<0.05). Compared to the profile before treatment,only inclination of lower incisors changed significantly after treatment (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetric extractions is feasible in treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions evidenced by retractions of both upper and lower incisors and improves sagittal soft-tissue profile. Supported by Research Fund of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No.08DZ2271100).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: To analyze hard and soft tissue profile changes before and after asymmetric extraction treatment of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion. METHODS: Thirty patients of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions (11 males, 19 females, average age 13.6 years) were divided into two groups according to their extraction approach. In asymmetric extraction group, 2 first maxillary premolars and 1 first mandibular premolar were extracted. In the control group, all 4 first premolars were extracted. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatment to compare hard and soft-tissue changes between the two groups, and the cephalometric measurements were analysed by SAS6.12 software package for independent sample t test. RESULTS: In comparison of the changes between the two groups, significant differences in dentoskeletal measurements were observed with NAPog, SNA, ANB, MP-SN and with the inclinations of the upper and lower incisors (P<0.01). Significant differences in soft-tissue changes were also observed in the thickness of upper lip, the Z angle (P<0.01) and the nasolabial angle (P<0.05). Compared to the profile before treatment,only inclination of lower incisors changed significantly after treatment (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetric extractions is feasible in treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions evidenced by retractions of both upper and lower incisors and improves sagittal soft-tissue profile. Supported by Research Fund of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No.08DZ2271100).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze hard and soft tissue profile changes before and after asymmetric extraction treatment of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion. METHODS: Thirty patients of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions (11 males, 19 females, average age 13.6 years) were divided into two groups according to their extraction approach. In asymmetric extraction group, 2 first maxillary premolars and 1 first mandibular premolar were extracted. In the control group, all 4 first premolars were extracted. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatment to compare hard and soft-tissue changes between the two groups, and the cephalometric measurements were analysed by SAS6.12 software package for independent sample t test. RESULTS: In comparison of the changes between the two groups, significant differences in dentoskeletal measurements were observed with NAPog, SNA, ANB, MP-SN and with the inclinations of the upper and lower incisors (P<0.01). Significant differences in soft-tissue changes were also observed in the thickness of upper lip, the Z angle (P<0.01) and the nasolabial angle (P<0.05). Compared to the profile before treatment,only inclination of lower incisors changed significantly after treatment (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetric extractions is feasible in treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions evidenced by retractions of both upper and lower incisors and improves sagittal soft-tissue profile. Supported by Research Fund of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No.08DZ2271100).

Key concepts: Premolar, Soft tissue, Malocclusion, Dentistry, Sagittal plane, Orthodontics, Hard tissue, Cephalometry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[The effectiveness of asymmetric extraction in treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens