1987•PubMedRequires access

A prospective study of the accuracy of ultrasound in predicting fetal microcephaly.

Frank A. Chervenak, Jacob Rosenberg, REBECCA C. BRIGHTMAN, Usha Chitkara, Phillipe Jeanty

Open publisher page 57 citations

Abstract

A prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the prediction of fetal microcephaly was performed on a study population of 24 patients. An occipitofrontal diameter larger than the predicted mean -2 standard deviations (SD), a head perimeter larger than the predicted mean -2 SD, and a head perimeter/abdominal perimeter larger than the predicted mean -1 SD were found to exclude fetal microcephaly. An occipitofrontal diameter smaller than the predicted mean -4 SD, a head perimeter smaller than the predicted mean -5 SD, a head perimeter/abdominal perimeter smaller than the predicted mean -3 SD, and a femur length/head perimeter larger than the predicted mean +3 SD were found to cause no errors in the diagnosis of microcephaly. If neither of these two groups of tests is satisfied, fetal microcephaly cannot be reliably diagnosed or excluded on the basis of a single ultrasound examination.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the prediction of fetal microcephaly was performed on a study population of 24 patients. An occipitofrontal diameter larger than the predicted mean -2 standard deviations (SD), a head perimeter larger than the predicted mean -2 SD, and a head perimeter/abdominal perimeter larger than the predicted mean -1 SD were found to exclude fetal microcephaly. An occipitofrontal diameter smaller than the predicted mean -4 SD, a head perimeter smaller than the predicted mean -5 SD, a head perimeter/abdominal perimeter smaller than the predicted mean -3 SD, and a femur length/head perimeter larger than the predicted mean +3 SD were found to cause no errors in the diagnosis of microcephaly. If neither of these two groups of tests is satisfied, fetal microcephaly cannot be reliably diagnosed or excluded on the basis of a single ultrasound examination.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 57 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the prediction of fetal microcephaly was performed on a study population of 24 patients. An occipitofrontal diameter larger than the predicted mean -2 standard deviations (SD), a head perimeter larger than the predicted mean -2 SD, and a head perimeter/abdominal perimeter larger than the predicted mean -1 SD were found to exclude fetal microcephaly. An occipitofrontal diameter smaller than the predicted mean -4 SD, a head perimeter smaller than the predicted mean -5 SD, a head perimeter/abdominal perimeter smaller than the predicted mean -3 SD, and a femur length/head perimeter larger than the predicted mean +3 SD were found to cause no errors in the diagnosis of microcephaly. If neither of these two groups of tests is satisfied, fetal microcephaly cannot be reliably diagnosed or excluded on the basis of a single ultrasound examination.

Key concepts: Perimeter, Medicine, Microcephaly, Fetal head, Ultrasound, Prospective cohort study, Head circumference, Population

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A prospective study of the accuracy of ultrasound in predicting fetal microcephaly. — Research Paper | ScholarLens