2016•Témoigner. Entre Histoire et MémoireOpen access

Let us into the house of the dead

Marie Fierens, Jacques Fierens

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

This article revisits the genocide of the Tutsis in Rwanda and makes a passionate plea for rendering justice to the victims. The authors also remind us of the difficulties of such an enterprise, pointing to a negationist discourse that takes various shapes. The first kind of denial was that of the perpetrators of the genocide and originated at the time of the crimes. The international community – institutions and states – have then misjudged the situation, and the western media played an ambiguous role. This gave rise to a “low-grade, almost involuntary denial” that made the perpetrators’ “premeditated denial” possible. The article thus examines different aspects, types and stages of denial. Its focus lays specifically on the Rwandan context, essential for anyone who seeks to understand the evolution of negationist discourse. The authors’ ultimate goal is to reopen the debate on justice and to critically assess the way we deal with genocide denial.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article revisits the genocide of the Tutsis in Rwanda and makes a passionate plea for rendering justice to the victims. The authors also remind us of the difficulties of such an enterprise, pointing to a negationist discourse that takes various shapes. The first kind of denial was that of the perpetrators of the genocide and originated at the time of the crimes. The international community – institutions and states – have then misjudged the situation, and the western media played an ambiguous role. This gave rise to a “low-grade, almost involuntary denial” that made the perpetrators’ “premeditated denial” possible. The article thus examines different aspects, types and stages of denial. Its focus lays specifically on the Rwandan context, essential for anyone who seeks to understand the evolution of negationist discourse. The authors’ ultimate goal is to reopen the debate on justice and to critically assess the way we deal with genocide denial.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article revisits the genocide of the Tutsis in Rwanda and makes a passionate plea for rendering justice to the victims. The authors also remind us of the difficulties of such an enterprise, pointing to a negationist discourse that takes various shapes. The first kind of denial was that of the perpetrators of the genocide and originated at the time of the crimes. The international community – institutions and states – have then misjudged the situation, and the western media played an ambiguous role. This gave rise to a “low-grade, almost involuntary denial” that made the perpetrators’ “premeditated denial” possible. The article thus examines different aspects, types and stages of denial. Its focus lays specifically on the Rwandan context, essential for anyone who seeks to understand the evolution of negationist discourse. The authors’ ultimate goal is to reopen the debate on justice and to critically assess the way we deal with genocide denial.

Key concepts: Denial, Genocide, Plea, Sociology, Political science, Context (archaeology), Economic Justice, Terrorism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Let us into the house of the dead — Research Paper | ScholarLens