Let us into the house of the dead
Marie Fierens, Jacques Fierens
Abstract
Open-access reader
Marie Fierens, Jacques Fierens
Abstract
Open-access reader
This article revisits the genocide of the Tutsis in Rwanda and makes a passionate plea for rendering justice to the victims. The authors also remind us of the difficulties of such an enterprise, pointing to a negationist discourse that takes various shapes. The first kind of denial was that of the perpetrators of the genocide and originated at the time of the crimes. The international community – institutions and states – have then misjudged the situation, and the western media played an ambiguous role. This gave rise to a “low-grade, almost involuntary denial” that made the perpetrators’ “premeditated denial” possible. The article thus examines different aspects, types and stages of denial. Its focus lays specifically on the Rwandan context, essential for anyone who seeks to understand the evolution of negationist discourse. The authors’ ultimate goal is to reopen the debate on justice and to critically assess the way we deal with genocide denial.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article revisits the genocide of the Tutsis in Rwanda and makes a passionate plea for rendering justice to the victims. The authors also remind us of the difficulties of such an enterprise, pointing to a negationist discourse that takes various shapes. The first kind of denial was that of the perpetrators of the genocide and originated at the time of the crimes. The international community – institutions and states – have then misjudged the situation, and the western media played an ambiguous role. This gave rise to a “low-grade, almost involuntary denial” that made the perpetrators’ “premeditated denial” possible. The article thus examines different aspects, types and stages of denial. Its focus lays specifically on the Rwandan context, essential for anyone who seeks to understand the evolution of negationist discourse. The authors’ ultimate goal is to reopen the debate on justice and to critically assess the way we deal with genocide denial.
Key concepts: Denial, Genocide, Plea, Sociology, Political science, Context (archaeology), Economic Justice, Terrorism