1995Journal of Crime and JusticeRequires access

THE STATE OF PLEA BARGAINING IN ALASKA

Otwin Marenin

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

In 1975, Alaska's Attorney General banned plea bargaining by prosecutors. The ban and a later evaluation of its impacts are frequently cited in the literature to support arguments that plea bargaining can be abolished with little effect on the efficient functioning of the court system. These conclusions, though, are inaccurate. Plea bargaining did not disappear in Alaska following the ban and plea bargaining is alive and well now. The research design used to assess the impact of the ban was flawed; the causal inferences drawn by the authors of the evaluation study are unpersuasive and invalid Also, substantial changes in legal guidelines and case law have occurred in Alaska since 1980. The literature on plea bargaining, hence, needs to be more careful in checking the conclusions it accepts as valid and it needs to keep abreast of changes which affect generalizations about plea bargaining derived from the Alaska experience.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 1975, Alaska's Attorney General banned plea bargaining by prosecutors. The ban and a later evaluation of its impacts are frequently cited in the literature to support arguments that plea bargaining can be abolished with little effect on the efficient functioning of the court system. These conclusions, though, are inaccurate. Plea bargaining did not disappear in Alaska following the ban and plea bargaining is alive and well now. The research design used to assess the impact of the ban was flawed; the causal inferences drawn by the authors of the evaluation study are unpersuasive and invalid Also, substantial changes in legal guidelines and case law have occurred in Alaska since 1980. The literature on plea bargaining, hence, needs to be more careful in checking the conclusions it accepts as valid and it needs to keep abreast of changes which affect generalizations about plea bargaining derived from the Alaska experience.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 1975, Alaska's Attorney General banned plea bargaining by prosecutors. The ban and a later evaluation of its impacts are frequently cited in the literature to support arguments that plea bargaining can be abolished with little effect on the efficient functioning of the court system. These conclusions, though, are inaccurate. Plea bargaining did not disappear in Alaska following the ban and plea bargaining is alive and well now. The research design used to assess the impact of the ban was flawed; the causal inferences drawn by the authors of the evaluation study are unpersuasive and invalid Also, substantial changes in legal guidelines and case law have occurred in Alaska since 1980. The literature on plea bargaining, hence, needs to be more careful in checking the conclusions it accepts as valid and it needs to keep abreast of changes which affect generalizations about plea bargaining derived from the Alaska experience.

Key concepts: Plea, State (computer science), Law, Political science, Law and economics, Affect (linguistics), Economics, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE STATE OF PLEA BARGAINING IN ALASKA — Research Paper | ScholarLens