1992PubMedRequires access

Comparison of norfloxacin and pefloxacin in the prophylaxis of bacterial infection in neutropenic cancer patients.

Domenico D’Antonio, A Iacone, Giuseppe Fioritoni, S Betti, Mario dell’Isola, Anna Quaglietta, Patrizia Accorsi, V Pantalone, Anna Grazia Recchia, A. Piergallini

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

In this study the efficacy of norfloxacin and pefloxacin for the antibacterial prophylaxis of granulocytopenia was compared in cancer patients following cytostatic treatment. A total of 136 patients was randomly selected to receive either norfloxacin or pefloxacin. Nineteen patients remained afebrile in the norfloxacin group compared with thirty one in the pefloxacin group (p = 0.045). Twenty four microbiologically documented infections (twelve with and twelve without bacteraemia) occurred in sixty seven patients taking norfloxacin, and twelve in sixty nine patients taking pefloxacin (five with and seven without bacteraemia) (p = 0.015). Only one infection caused by Gram-negative bacilli was observed in the pefloxacin group compared with seven in the norfloxacin group (p = 0.019). In conclusion, both microbiological and clinical results showed pefloxacin to be a better antibacterial agent than norfloxacin for these patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study the efficacy of norfloxacin and pefloxacin for the antibacterial prophylaxis of granulocytopenia was compared in cancer patients following cytostatic treatment. A total of 136 patients was randomly selected to receive either norfloxacin or pefloxacin. Nineteen patients remained afebrile in the norfloxacin group compared with thirty one in the pefloxacin group (p = 0.045). Twenty four microbiologically documented infections (twelve with and twelve without bacteraemia) occurred in sixty seven patients taking norfloxacin, and twelve in sixty nine patients taking pefloxacin (five with and seven without bacteraemia) (p = 0.015). Only one infection caused by Gram-negative bacilli was observed in the pefloxacin group compared with seven in the norfloxacin group (p = 0.019). In conclusion, both microbiological and clinical results showed pefloxacin to be a better antibacterial agent than norfloxacin for these patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study the efficacy of norfloxacin and pefloxacin for the antibacterial prophylaxis of granulocytopenia was compared in cancer patients following cytostatic treatment. A total of 136 patients was randomly selected to receive either norfloxacin or pefloxacin. Nineteen patients remained afebrile in the norfloxacin group compared with thirty one in the pefloxacin group (p = 0.045). Twenty four microbiologically documented infections (twelve with and twelve without bacteraemia) occurred in sixty seven patients taking norfloxacin, and twelve in sixty nine patients taking pefloxacin (five with and seven without bacteraemia) (p = 0.015). Only one infection caused by Gram-negative bacilli was observed in the pefloxacin group compared with seven in the norfloxacin group (p = 0.019). In conclusion, both microbiological and clinical results showed pefloxacin to be a better antibacterial agent than norfloxacin for these patients.

Key concepts: Pefloxacin, Norfloxacin, Medicine, Antibacterial agent, Chemotherapy, Surgery, Internal medicine, Antibiotics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of norfloxacin and pefloxacin in the prophylaxis of bacterial infection in neutropenic cancer patients. — Research Paper | ScholarLens