1986Journal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapyRequires access

The comparative pharmacokinetics of five quinolones

Robert A. Wise, D. Lister, C. A. M. McNulty, D. J. Griggs, J. M. Andrews

Open publisher page 94 citations

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of five quinolones were studied in volunteers. The compounds were norfloxacin (400 mg po), enoxacin (400 mg iv and 600 mg po), ciprofloxacin (100 mg iv and 500 mg po), ofloxacin (600 mg po) and pefloxacin (400 mg iv). Of the oral agents studied ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were the most rapidly absorbed (Tmax = 1.2 h) and enoxacin the least (Tmax = 1.9 h). The serum levels attained were highest in the case of ofloxacin (after allowing for the higher dose administered). The serum half-lives were norfloxacin 3.75 h, ciprofloxacin 3.9 h (po), 4.0 h (iv), ofloxacin 7.0 h, enoxacin 6.2 h (po), 5.1 h (iv) and pefloxacin 10.5 h. All agents penetrated blister fluid readily. The 24 h urine recovery was 62% for oral enoxacin, 46.4% for iv enoxacin (plus 12.2% for oxo-enoxacin), 27% for norfloxacin, 30.6% for oral ciprofloxacin, 75.7% for iv ciprofloxacin, 73% for ofloxacin and 4.9% for pefloxacin (plus 9.2% for the norfloxacin metabolite and 17.8% for pefloxacin N-oxide).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of five quinolones were studied in volunteers. The compounds were norfloxacin (400 mg po), enoxacin (400 mg iv and 600 mg po), ciprofloxacin (100 mg iv and 500 mg po), ofloxacin (600 mg po) and pefloxacin (400 mg iv). Of the oral agents studied ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were the most rapidly absorbed (Tmax = 1.2 h) and enoxacin the least (Tmax = 1.9 h). The serum levels attained were highest in the case of ofloxacin (after allowing for the higher dose administered). The serum half-lives were norfloxacin 3.75 h, ciprofloxacin 3.9 h (po), 4.0 h (iv), ofloxacin 7.0 h, enoxacin 6.2 h (po), 5.1 h (iv) and pefloxacin 10.5 h. All agents penetrated blister fluid readily. The 24 h urine recovery was 62% for oral enoxacin, 46.4% for iv enoxacin (plus 12.2% for oxo-enoxacin), 27% for norfloxacin, 30.6% for oral ciprofloxacin, 75.7% for iv ciprofloxacin, 73% for ofloxacin and 4.9% for pefloxacin (plus 9.2% for the norfloxacin metabolite and 17.8% for pefloxacin N-oxide).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 94 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of five quinolones were studied in volunteers. The compounds were norfloxacin (400 mg po), enoxacin (400 mg iv and 600 mg po), ciprofloxacin (100 mg iv and 500 mg po), ofloxacin (600 mg po) and pefloxacin (400 mg iv). Of the oral agents studied ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were the most rapidly absorbed (Tmax = 1.2 h) and enoxacin the least (Tmax = 1.9 h). The serum levels attained were highest in the case of ofloxacin (after allowing for the higher dose administered). The serum half-lives were norfloxacin 3.75 h, ciprofloxacin 3.9 h (po), 4.0 h (iv), ofloxacin 7.0 h, enoxacin 6.2 h (po), 5.1 h (iv) and pefloxacin 10.5 h. All agents penetrated blister fluid readily. The 24 h urine recovery was 62% for oral enoxacin, 46.4% for iv enoxacin (plus 12.2% for oxo-enoxacin), 27% for norfloxacin, 30.6% for oral ciprofloxacin, 75.7% for iv ciprofloxacin, 73% for ofloxacin and 4.9% for pefloxacin (plus 9.2% for the norfloxacin metabolite and 17.8% for pefloxacin N-oxide).

Key concepts: Enoxacin, Pefloxacin, Norfloxacin, Ofloxacin, Pharmacokinetics, Ciprofloxacin, Antibacterial agent, Pharmacology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The comparative pharmacokinetics of five quinolones — Research Paper | ScholarLens