2008LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Open access

Shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded with four different composite resins

Fábio Lourenço Romano, Lourenço Correr‐Sobrinho, Darcy Flávio Nouer, Américo Bortolazzo Correr, Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti, Maria Beatriz Borges de Araújo Magnani

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the shear bond strength of metallic brackets with different types of Concise composites and the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Sixty bovine permanent lower incisors were inserted into PVC tubes and divided into four groups (n = 15): Group 1 – Transbond XT (control) composite; Group 2– Concise restorative composite; Group 3 – Concise diluted restorative composite (Artun and Zachrisson's technique); and Group 4– Concise Orthodontic composite. After bonding the brackets, the samples were stored in distilled water at 37° C for 24 hours and then submitted to shear strength tests (Instron) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Analysis of variance and Tukey's test (5%) were used for statistically analysing the data regarding the shear bond strength results, whereas Kruskal-Wallis test was used for analysing the ARI scores. The shear bond strength mean values (MPa) for Group 1 (12.13) and Group 2 (12.20) were found to be statistically higher (p < .05) than that for Group 3 (8.20). No statistically significant differences were observed (p > .05) between Groups 1, 2, and 4 (9.86) as well as between Groups 3 and 4. Regarding the ARI evaluation, the majority of the fractures involved the bracket/ composite interface.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of this study was to assess the shear bond strength of metallic brackets with different types of Concise composites and the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Sixty bovine permanent lower incisors were inserted into PVC tubes and divided into four groups (n = 15): Group 1 – Transbond XT (control) composite; Group 2– Concise restorative composite; Group 3 – Concise diluted restorative composite (Artun and Zachrisson's technique); and Group 4– Concise Orthodontic composite. After bonding the brackets, the samples were stored in distilled water at 37° C for 24 hours and then submitted to shear strength tests (Instron) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Analysis of variance and Tukey's test (5%) were used for statistically analysing the data regarding the shear bond strength results, whereas Kruskal-Wallis test was used for analysing the ARI scores. The shear bond strength mean values (MPa) for Group 1 (12.13) and Group 2 (12.20) were found to be statistically higher (p < .05) than that for Group 3 (8.20). No statistically significant differences were observed (p > .05) between Groups 1, 2, and 4 (9.86) as well as between Groups 3 and 4. Regarding the ARI evaluation, the majority of the fractures involved the bracket/ composite interface.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the shear bond strength of metallic brackets with different types of Concise composites and the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Sixty bovine permanent lower incisors were inserted into PVC tubes and divided into four groups (n = 15): Group 1 – Transbond XT (control) composite; Group 2– Concise restorative composite; Group 3 – Concise diluted restorative composite (Artun and Zachrisson's technique); and Group 4– Concise Orthodontic composite. After bonding the brackets, the samples were stored in distilled water at 37° C for 24 hours and then submitted to shear strength tests (Instron) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Analysis of variance and Tukey's test (5%) were used for statistically analysing the data regarding the shear bond strength results, whereas Kruskal-Wallis test was used for analysing the ARI scores. The shear bond strength mean values (MPa) for Group 1 (12.13) and Group 2 (12.20) were found to be statistically higher (p < .05) than that for Group 3 (8.20). No statistically significant differences were observed (p > .05) between Groups 1, 2, and 4 (9.86) as well as between Groups 3 and 4. Regarding the ARI evaluation, the majority of the fractures involved the bracket/ composite interface.

Key concepts: Crosshead, Bracket, Composite number, Adhesive, Materials science, Composite material, Universal testing machine, Bond strength

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded with four different composite resins — Research Paper | ScholarLens