1987PubMedRequires access

Endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones without subsequent cholecystectomy.

Gunnar Olaison, B. Kald, Karlqvist Pa, Eva Lindström, B Anderberg

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Good results from endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for removing choledochal stones following cholecystectomy, have led to increasing use of the method when the gallbladder is in situ. The need for cholecystectomy after successful EST has been questioned. As cholecystectomy in elderly patients involves substantial risk, we routinely defer cholecystectomy in such patients while they remain asymptomatic. Experience of 40 cases is reported. Thirty-four were discharged without cholecystectomy and one underwent elective cholecystectomy at his own request. The remaining 33 patients were followed up for 6-53 (mean 21.5) months. Four died from causes unrelated to gallstone disease. Symptoms requiring cholecystectomy arose in two cases (6%). We found no problems due to refraining from routine elective cholecystectomy following EST for common bile duct stones. The rarity of later symptoms appears to justify a "wait and see" attitude to post-EST cholecystectomy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Good results from endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for removing choledochal stones following cholecystectomy, have led to increasing use of the method when the gallbladder is in situ. The need for cholecystectomy after successful EST has been questioned. As cholecystectomy in elderly patients involves substantial risk, we routinely defer cholecystectomy in such patients while they remain asymptomatic. Experience of 40 cases is reported. Thirty-four were discharged without cholecystectomy and one underwent elective cholecystectomy at his own request. The remaining 33 patients were followed up for 6-53 (mean 21.5) months. Four died from causes unrelated to gallstone disease. Symptoms requiring cholecystectomy arose in two cases (6%). We found no problems due to refraining from routine elective cholecystectomy following EST for common bile duct stones. The rarity of later symptoms appears to justify a "wait and see" attitude to post-EST cholecystectomy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Good results from endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for removing choledochal stones following cholecystectomy, have led to increasing use of the method when the gallbladder is in situ. The need for cholecystectomy after successful EST has been questioned. As cholecystectomy in elderly patients involves substantial risk, we routinely defer cholecystectomy in such patients while they remain asymptomatic. Experience of 40 cases is reported. Thirty-four were discharged without cholecystectomy and one underwent elective cholecystectomy at his own request. The remaining 33 patients were followed up for 6-53 (mean 21.5) months. Four died from causes unrelated to gallstone disease. Symptoms requiring cholecystectomy arose in two cases (6%). We found no problems due to refraining from routine elective cholecystectomy following EST for common bile duct stones. The rarity of later symptoms appears to justify a "wait and see" attitude to post-EST cholecystectomy.

Key concepts: Cholecystectomy, Medicine, Asymptomatic, General surgery, Bile duct, Gallbladder, Common bile duct, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones without subsequent cholecystectomy. — Research Paper | ScholarLens