2002•PubMedRequires access

[Antibacterial activities of fosfomycin against several fresh clinical isolates--comparison of the test methods for antibacterial activity].

Tetsuro Hara, Minako Araake, Hiroomi Watabe

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

In vitro antibacterial activity of fosfomycin was evaluated by various methods. Strains of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-sensitive coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Escherichia coli were much more susceptible when glucose-6-phosphate was added to the test medium, but strains of Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were not affected. Nutrient agar instead of Mueller-Hinton agar allowed to exhibiting the higher activity of fosfomycin against all the species tested. The activity of fosfomycin was as equivalent or superior to those of cefazolin, cefmetazole, cefotiam and piperacillin. The susceptibility of strains isolated during 2000 to 2001 to fosfomycin was almost the same as that of the isolates reported in 1975. Fosfomycin was considered to show high efficacy in several infections, since it has maintained its favorable antibacterial activities against several bacterial species for more than 20 years after the first application to clinical practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In vitro antibacterial activity of fosfomycin was evaluated by various methods. Strains of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-sensitive coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Escherichia coli were much more susceptible when glucose-6-phosphate was added to the test medium, but strains of Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were not affected. Nutrient agar instead of Mueller-Hinton agar allowed to exhibiting the higher activity of fosfomycin against all the species tested. The activity of fosfomycin was as equivalent or superior to those of cefazolin, cefmetazole, cefotiam and piperacillin. The susceptibility of strains isolated during 2000 to 2001 to fosfomycin was almost the same as that of the isolates reported in 1975. Fosfomycin was considered to show high efficacy in several infections, since it has maintained its favorable antibacterial activities against several bacterial species for more than 20 years after the first application to clinical practice.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In vitro antibacterial activity of fosfomycin was evaluated by various methods. Strains of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-sensitive coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Escherichia coli were much more susceptible when glucose-6-phosphate was added to the test medium, but strains of Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were not affected. Nutrient agar instead of Mueller-Hinton agar allowed to exhibiting the higher activity of fosfomycin against all the species tested. The activity of fosfomycin was as equivalent or superior to those of cefazolin, cefmetazole, cefotiam and piperacillin. The susceptibility of strains isolated during 2000 to 2001 to fosfomycin was almost the same as that of the isolates reported in 1975. Fosfomycin was considered to show high efficacy in several infections, since it has maintained its favorable antibacterial activities against several bacterial species for more than 20 years after the first application to clinical practice.

Key concepts: Fosfomycin, Microbiology, Cefotiam, Staphylococcus aureus, Serratia marcescens, Agar, Antibacterial activity, Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Antibacterial activities of fosfomycin against several fresh clinical isolates--comparison of the test methods for antibacterial activity]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens