[Effect of a new 10% hydroxyethyl starch solution HES/270/0.5 on blood coagulation, blood loss and hemodynamics in comparison with 3.5% PPL].
M. Penner, Abe Fingerhut, A Tacke
Abstract
M. Penner, Abe Fingerhut, A Tacke
Abstract
20 patients scheduled for total hip replacement were given 1,000 ml of a new preparation of 10% hydroxyethylstarch (HES) (MW 270,000: 0.5) preoperatively. They were compared to a group of 20 patients who received 1,000 ml of 3.5% plasma protein solution (PPS). HES caused a more pronounced hemodilution than PPS. With HES, central venous pressure (CVP) rose significantly higher than with PPS. PTT was significantly prolonged in the HES but not in the PPS group. TT was significantly reduced by HES in comparison to PPS. PT (Quick-value %) and fibrinogen levels showed no difference in both groups. Blood loss and transfusion volume were comparable to HES and PPS until 24 h after the operation. One patient showed generalised flush after HES. This HES preparation is a colloid with volume-expanding properties and appears to be without clinically apparent effects on coagulation (up to a volume of 11).
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
20 patients scheduled for total hip replacement were given 1,000 ml of a new preparation of 10% hydroxyethylstarch (HES) (MW 270,000: 0.5) preoperatively. They were compared to a group of 20 patients who received 1,000 ml of 3.5% plasma protein solution (PPS). HES caused a more pronounced hemodilution than PPS. With HES, central venous pressure (CVP) rose significantly higher than with PPS. PTT was significantly prolonged in the HES but not in the PPS group. TT was significantly reduced by HES in comparison to PPS. PT (Quick-value %) and fibrinogen levels showed no difference in both groups. Blood loss and transfusion volume were comparable to HES and PPS until 24 h after the operation. One patient showed generalised flush after HES. This HES preparation is a colloid with volume-expanding properties and appears to be without clinically apparent effects on coagulation (up to a volume of 11).
Key concepts: Hydroxyethyl starch, Fibrinogen, Medicine, Hemodynamics, Coagulation, Anesthesia, Blood volume, Central venous pressure