[Scleromyxedema without paraproteinemia].
G Pravatà, Giuseppe Noto, Maurizio Aricò
Abstract
G Pravatà, Giuseppe Noto, Maurizio Aricò
Abstract
The identification of an abnormal paraproteinaemia has been considered as main criterium for the diagnosis of scleromyxedema. We report a case of scleromyxedema in a 51-year old man, without any immunochemical evidence of paraprotein. Our case is a clinical support to the independence of this disease from gammopathy, as underlined by other experimental and clinical data. Thus demonstration of paraprotein should not be considered as a fundamental criterion for the diagnosis of scleromyxedema.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The identification of an abnormal paraproteinaemia has been considered as main criterium for the diagnosis of scleromyxedema. We report a case of scleromyxedema in a 51-year old man, without any immunochemical evidence of paraprotein. Our case is a clinical support to the independence of this disease from gammopathy, as underlined by other experimental and clinical data. Thus demonstration of paraprotein should not be considered as a fundamental criterion for the diagnosis of scleromyxedema.
Key concepts: Paraproteinemia, Medicine, Paraproteinemias, Dermatology, Myxedema, Pathology, Multiple myeloma, Immunology