1991•PubMedRequires access

[Comparison of two methods for therapeutic drug monitoring: FPIA (TDx) and Emit].

Bogovskiĭ Bp, E Iu Barmanova

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Two procedures of immunoassay used for therapeutic drug monitoring were studied: fluorescence-polarization immunoassay using specific reagents and analyzer TDx ("Abbott") and enzyme immunoassay using specific reagents from "Syva" and analyzer Centrifichem 600 ("Baker Instr"). Control blood sera containing known concentrations of theophylline and quinidine as well as blood sera from patients treated with these drugs were analyzed within low, middle and high ranges. The data of both these procedures correlated at the high rate (r-0.93-0.96). Identity, reproducibility and accuracy of the theophylline and quinidine concentrations measurement using fluorescence-polarization immunoassay constituted 1.4-3.5%, 2.0-8.5% and 95-109%, respectively, thus satisfying the high requirements and were superior as compared with corresponding parameters of the enzyme immunoassay.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two procedures of immunoassay used for therapeutic drug monitoring were studied: fluorescence-polarization immunoassay using specific reagents and analyzer TDx ("Abbott") and enzyme immunoassay using specific reagents from "Syva" and analyzer Centrifichem 600 ("Baker Instr"). Control blood sera containing known concentrations of theophylline and quinidine as well as blood sera from patients treated with these drugs were analyzed within low, middle and high ranges. The data of both these procedures correlated at the high rate (r-0.93-0.96). Identity, reproducibility and accuracy of the theophylline and quinidine concentrations measurement using fluorescence-polarization immunoassay constituted 1.4-3.5%, 2.0-8.5% and 95-109%, respectively, thus satisfying the high requirements and were superior as compared with corresponding parameters of the enzyme immunoassay.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two procedures of immunoassay used for therapeutic drug monitoring were studied: fluorescence-polarization immunoassay using specific reagents and analyzer TDx ("Abbott") and enzyme immunoassay using specific reagents from "Syva" and analyzer Centrifichem 600 ("Baker Instr"). Control blood sera containing known concentrations of theophylline and quinidine as well as blood sera from patients treated with these drugs were analyzed within low, middle and high ranges. The data of both these procedures correlated at the high rate (r-0.93-0.96). Identity, reproducibility and accuracy of the theophylline and quinidine concentrations measurement using fluorescence-polarization immunoassay constituted 1.4-3.5%, 2.0-8.5% and 95-109%, respectively, thus satisfying the high requirements and were superior as compared with corresponding parameters of the enzyme immunoassay.

Key concepts: Fluorescence polarization immunoassay, Immunoassay, Quinidine, Chromatography, Chemistry, Theophylline, Therapeutic drug monitoring, Reagent

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison of two methods for therapeutic drug monitoring: FPIA (TDx) and Emit]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens