1996•Therapeutic Drug MonitoringRequires access

Enzyme-Multiplied Immunoassay (EMIT 2000) Digoxin Assay Compared with Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay and Amerlex 125I-Radioimmunoassay at Two Australian Centers

Nunzia C. Saccoia, L. Peter Hackett, Raymond G. Morris, Kenneth F. Ilett

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Digoxin assays in plasma from patients treated with the drug have played an integral role in its therapeutic management. Commercial digoxin immunoassays have been criticized for poor performance owing to various interferences and limited sensitivity. The present study compared the performance of a new enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT 2000) to fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and radioimmunoassay (RIA) in two separate Australian centers. Comparisons were made using standard indices of precision and accuracy, samples taken from patients, quality-assurance samples, and cord blood samples from neonates, in which high concentrations of digoxin-like immunoreactive substances (DLIS) would be anticipated. The results confirmed satisfactory precision and accuracy for therapeutic drug monitoring purposes, a sensitivity of < 0.1 microgram/L, and very low DLIS interference, as assessed by assay of neonatal cord blood samples.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Digoxin assays in plasma from patients treated with the drug have played an integral role in its therapeutic management. Commercial digoxin immunoassays have been criticized for poor performance owing to various interferences and limited sensitivity. The present study compared the performance of a new enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT 2000) to fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and radioimmunoassay (RIA) in two separate Australian centers. Comparisons were made using standard indices of precision and accuracy, samples taken from patients, quality-assurance samples, and cord blood samples from neonates, in which high concentrations of digoxin-like immunoreactive substances (DLIS) would be anticipated. The results confirmed satisfactory precision and accuracy for therapeutic drug monitoring purposes, a sensitivity of < 0.1 microgram/L, and very low DLIS interference, as assessed by assay of neonatal cord blood samples.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Digoxin assays in plasma from patients treated with the drug have played an integral role in its therapeutic management. Commercial digoxin immunoassays have been criticized for poor performance owing to various interferences and limited sensitivity. The present study compared the performance of a new enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT 2000) to fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and radioimmunoassay (RIA) in two separate Australian centers. Comparisons were made using standard indices of precision and accuracy, samples taken from patients, quality-assurance samples, and cord blood samples from neonates, in which high concentrations of digoxin-like immunoreactive substances (DLIS) would be anticipated. The results confirmed satisfactory precision and accuracy for therapeutic drug monitoring purposes, a sensitivity of < 0.1 microgram/L, and very low DLIS interference, as assessed by assay of neonatal cord blood samples.

Key concepts: Radioimmunoassay, Immunoassay, Fluorescence polarization immunoassay, Digoxin, Chromatography, Therapeutic drug monitoring, Chemistry, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Enzyme-Multiplied Immunoassay (EMIT 2000) Digoxin Assay Compared with Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay and Amerlex 125I-Radioimmunoassay at Two Australian Centers — Research Paper | ScholarLens