1992PubMedRequires access

Embolization and chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

B Damascelli, F Garbagnati, Alfonso Marchianò, Monica Salvetti, Giuseppe Di Tolla, Rodolfo Lanocita

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

A check on the rationale for embolization and chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma and a revisit to the background of the anatomy of blood supply to the liver is discussed. The technique of the embolization is different and mostly in the range of home made configuration. There is no data concerning the stability of different choices such as the popular mixture of cytotoxic agents and lipiodol. Therefore the authors have preferred the use of microencapsulated Mitomycin believing that this special formulation of the drug can attain the present best reproducibility. The survival of 32 treated patients was longer than the control group. Twelve, 36 and 60 month survival was 70%, 45% and 15% vs 37%, 0%, and 0% respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A check on the rationale for embolization and chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma and a revisit to the background of the anatomy of blood supply to the liver is discussed. The technique of the embolization is different and mostly in the range of home made configuration. There is no data concerning the stability of different choices such as the popular mixture of cytotoxic agents and lipiodol. Therefore the authors have preferred the use of microencapsulated Mitomycin believing that this special formulation of the drug can attain the present best reproducibility. The survival of 32 treated patients was longer than the control group. Twelve, 36 and 60 month survival was 70%, 45% and 15% vs 37%, 0%, and 0% respectively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A check on the rationale for embolization and chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma and a revisit to the background of the anatomy of blood supply to the liver is discussed. The technique of the embolization is different and mostly in the range of home made configuration. There is no data concerning the stability of different choices such as the popular mixture of cytotoxic agents and lipiodol. Therefore the authors have preferred the use of microencapsulated Mitomycin believing that this special formulation of the drug can attain the present best reproducibility. The survival of 32 treated patients was longer than the control group. Twelve, 36 and 60 month survival was 70%, 45% and 15% vs 37%, 0%, and 0% respectively.

Key concepts: Lipiodol, Medicine, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Embolization, Mitomycin C, Carcinoma, Radiology, Liver cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Embolization and chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. — Research Paper | ScholarLens