[Clinical results of selective treatment for flail chest].
T. Kasai, Kimitaka Tajimi, Kensuke Kobayashi
Abstract
T. Kasai, Kimitaka Tajimi, Kensuke Kobayashi
Abstract
A better understanding in pathophysiology of flail chest has brought an evolution to the principles of it's management. The methods of stabilization changed from surgical to pneumatic measures and now, a concept of conservative treatment is recognized. Adhering to our protocol for flail chest, which essentially limits mechanical ventilation, we have prospectively treated 36 patients since 1981. The patient were divided into two groups according to their need for mechanical ventilation. There were 16 patients (44.4%) in a group treated in conservative manner and with no mechanical ventilation (Group A). There were 20 patients (55.6%) in a group treated by mechanical ventilation (Group B). Group A had 6.2% incidence of pneumonia, 3.6 days average stay in ICU and mortality rate of 0%. Group B had 75% pneumonia, 22.5 days average in ICU and 15% mortality. Group B patients required respiratory support for 14 days average, which was not reduced by surgical stabilization. Restrictive pulmonary disturbance in group A was milder than that of group B, and this again was not affected by surgical stabilization. We conclude that 40% of flail chest are controllable without mechanical ventilation and that the result of this conservative therapy is superior to any other treatments.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A better understanding in pathophysiology of flail chest has brought an evolution to the principles of it's management. The methods of stabilization changed from surgical to pneumatic measures and now, a concept of conservative treatment is recognized. Adhering to our protocol for flail chest, which essentially limits mechanical ventilation, we have prospectively treated 36 patients since 1981. The patient were divided into two groups according to their need for mechanical ventilation. There were 16 patients (44.4%) in a group treated in conservative manner and with no mechanical ventilation (Group A). There were 20 patients (55.6%) in a group treated by mechanical ventilation (Group B). Group A had 6.2% incidence of pneumonia, 3.6 days average stay in ICU and mortality rate of 0%. Group B had 75% pneumonia, 22.5 days average in ICU and 15% mortality. Group B patients required respiratory support for 14 days average, which was not reduced by surgical stabilization. Restrictive pulmonary disturbance in group A was milder than that of group B, and this again was not affected by surgical stabilization. We conclude that 40% of flail chest are controllable without mechanical ventilation and that the result of this conservative therapy is superior to any other treatments.
Key concepts: Medicine, Flail chest, Mechanical ventilation, Pneumonia, Conservative treatment, Surgery, Incidence (geometry), Group B