1985PubMedRequires access

Comparison between ranitidine and cimetidine in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer.

A Capria, G. Bresci, Guido Rindi, M Geloni, G Corsini

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Two groups of 46 and 49 patients each with endoscopically proved duodenal ulcer and not previously treated, received ranitidine (150 mg X 2 daily) and cimetidine (1 g/day) respectively for eight weeks. The disappearance of the ulcer was observed endoscopically in 78% of both the first and second groups of patients. Of the ten patients non-responders to ranitidine, six were treated again for eight weeks with ranitidine and four with cimetidine for eight weeks; all of them recovered completely apart from one of the cimetidine treated patients. Of the 11 patients non-responders to cimetidine, seven were retreated with cimetidine and 4 with ranitidine for a further eight weeks and all of them obtained a complete recovery except for one of the cimetidine treated patients. No relevant side-effects were observed with either drug. In conclusion cimetidine and ranitidine showed a comparable therapeutic value.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two groups of 46 and 49 patients each with endoscopically proved duodenal ulcer and not previously treated, received ranitidine (150 mg X 2 daily) and cimetidine (1 g/day) respectively for eight weeks. The disappearance of the ulcer was observed endoscopically in 78% of both the first and second groups of patients. Of the ten patients non-responders to ranitidine, six were treated again for eight weeks with ranitidine and four with cimetidine for eight weeks; all of them recovered completely apart from one of the cimetidine treated patients. Of the 11 patients non-responders to cimetidine, seven were retreated with cimetidine and 4 with ranitidine for a further eight weeks and all of them obtained a complete recovery except for one of the cimetidine treated patients. No relevant side-effects were observed with either drug. In conclusion cimetidine and ranitidine showed a comparable therapeutic value.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two groups of 46 and 49 patients each with endoscopically proved duodenal ulcer and not previously treated, received ranitidine (150 mg X 2 daily) and cimetidine (1 g/day) respectively for eight weeks. The disappearance of the ulcer was observed endoscopically in 78% of both the first and second groups of patients. Of the ten patients non-responders to ranitidine, six were treated again for eight weeks with ranitidine and four with cimetidine for eight weeks; all of them recovered completely apart from one of the cimetidine treated patients. Of the 11 patients non-responders to cimetidine, seven were retreated with cimetidine and 4 with ranitidine for a further eight weeks and all of them obtained a complete recovery except for one of the cimetidine treated patients. No relevant side-effects were observed with either drug. In conclusion cimetidine and ranitidine showed a comparable therapeutic value.

Key concepts: Cimetidine, Ranitidine, Medicine, Duodenal ulcer, Histamine H2 receptor, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Drug interaction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between ranitidine and cimetidine in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer. — Research Paper | ScholarLens