A 12-month clinical study comparing four glass ionomer cements for the cementation of orthodontic molar bands.
Fricker Jp
Abstract
Fricker Jp
Abstract
Four different glass ionomer cements were evaluated in vivo as luting agents for orthodontic molar bands. A sample of 199 patients with full fixed appliances (Begg Light Wire) were monitored over a period of 12 months during active treatment for loose molar bands. Failures for each cement were: Fuji I, 2.5 percent, Fuji II, 4.5 percent, Ketac-Cem, 4.0 percent and Hy-Bond Luting, 3.0 percent. Chi squared tests showed no statistical difference in failure rates for each cement.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Four different glass ionomer cements were evaluated in vivo as luting agents for orthodontic molar bands. A sample of 199 patients with full fixed appliances (Begg Light Wire) were monitored over a period of 12 months during active treatment for loose molar bands. Failures for each cement were: Fuji I, 2.5 percent, Fuji II, 4.5 percent, Ketac-Cem, 4.0 percent and Hy-Bond Luting, 3.0 percent. Chi squared tests showed no statistical difference in failure rates for each cement.
Key concepts: Glass ionomer cement, Cementation (geology), Molar, Dentistry, Materials science, Cement, Orthodontics, Medicine