1989PubMedRequires access

A 12-month clinical study comparing four glass ionomer cements for the cementation of orthodontic molar bands.

Fricker Jp

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Four different glass ionomer cements were evaluated in vivo as luting agents for orthodontic molar bands. A sample of 199 patients with full fixed appliances (Begg Light Wire) were monitored over a period of 12 months during active treatment for loose molar bands. Failures for each cement were: Fuji I, 2.5 percent, Fuji II, 4.5 percent, Ketac-Cem, 4.0 percent and Hy-Bond Luting, 3.0 percent. Chi squared tests showed no statistical difference in failure rates for each cement.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Four different glass ionomer cements were evaluated in vivo as luting agents for orthodontic molar bands. A sample of 199 patients with full fixed appliances (Begg Light Wire) were monitored over a period of 12 months during active treatment for loose molar bands. Failures for each cement were: Fuji I, 2.5 percent, Fuji II, 4.5 percent, Ketac-Cem, 4.0 percent and Hy-Bond Luting, 3.0 percent. Chi squared tests showed no statistical difference in failure rates for each cement.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Four different glass ionomer cements were evaluated in vivo as luting agents for orthodontic molar bands. A sample of 199 patients with full fixed appliances (Begg Light Wire) were monitored over a period of 12 months during active treatment for loose molar bands. Failures for each cement were: Fuji I, 2.5 percent, Fuji II, 4.5 percent, Ketac-Cem, 4.0 percent and Hy-Bond Luting, 3.0 percent. Chi squared tests showed no statistical difference in failure rates for each cement.

Key concepts: Glass ionomer cement, Cementation (geology), Molar, Dentistry, Materials science, Cement, Orthodontics, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A 12-month clinical study comparing four glass ionomer cements for the cementation of orthodontic molar bands. — Research Paper | ScholarLens