[Preliminary study of astrocytic tumors by diffusion tensor imaging].
Weidong Zhang, Bi‐Ling Liang, Sui-Qiao Huang, YE Rui-xin
Abstract
Weidong Zhang, Bi‐Ling Liang, Sui-Qiao Huang, YE Rui-xin
Abstract
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an advanced quantitative form of diffusion-weighted imaging. It could be used to calculate not only the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of average water diffusion for each vowel, but also the diffusion anisotropic index of diffusion. Diffusion-weighted imaging is used in most of the studies of the brain tumors abroad. We used DTI method to measure the ADC, fractional anisotropy (FA) and relative anisotropy (RA), values of different tumor tissues and to evaluate the usefulness of ADC, FA, and RA in differentiating solid tumor, necrotic region, edema region, normal brain tissue, and in grading the malignancy of cerebral astrocytomas. METHODS: Fourteen cases of astrocytomas diagnosed (10 cases of grade 1-2 astrocytomas and 4 cases of grade 3-4 astrocytomas) were studied by DTI. ADC, FA, and RA values of different tumor tissue were measured. RESULTS: When all cases were analyzed as a group, significant differences of ADC were found in enhancing solid tumor (1.14+/-0.13x10(-3) mm(2)/s), necrotic region (2.04+/-0.50x10(-3) mm(2)/s), edema region (1.55+/-0.19x10(-3) mm(2)/s) compared with normal brain tissue (0.74+/-0.08x10(-3) mm(2)/s)(P< 0.05). Significant differences of ADC were also found in solid tumor (enhancing tissue:1.14+/-0.13x10(-3) mm(2)/s, non-enhancing tissue:1.01+/-0.25x10(-3) mm(2)/s) compared with necrotic region and edema region, respectively (P< 0.05). Significant differences of FA and RA were found in solid enhancing region (FA:0.21+/-0.08; RA:0.23+/-0.07), necrotic region (FA: 0.14+/-0.06, RA: 0.16+/-0.07), edema region (FA:0.16+/-0.04, RA:0.16+/-0.02) compared with normal brain tissue (FA: 0.37+/-0.06, RA: 0.38+/-0.07) (P< 0.05). No difference of FA and RA was found in solid tumor (including enhancing and non-enhancing tissue). Significant differences of ADC (P< 0.05), not FA and RA, were found between grade 1-2 astrocytomas (1.07+/-0.04x10(-3) mm(2)/s) and grade 3-4 astrocytomas (1.32+/-0.08x10(-3) mm(2)/s). CONCLUSION: Determination of ADC can be used to differentiate normal brain tissue from enhancing solid tumor, necrotic region, and edema region. Determination of FA and RA can be used to differentiate solid enhancing tumor, necrotic region, and edema region from normal brain tissue, but can not be used to differentiate solid tumor, necrotic region, and edema region. The ADC values, not FA and RA, may predict the degree of malignancy of astrocytic tumors.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an advanced quantitative form of diffusion-weighted imaging. It could be used to calculate not only the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of average water diffusion for each vowel, but also the diffusion anisotropic index of diffusion. Diffusion-weighted imaging is used in most of the studies of the brain tumors abroad. We used DTI method to measure the ADC, fractional anisotropy (FA) and relative anisotropy (RA), values of different tumor tissues and to evaluate the usefulness of ADC, FA, and RA in differentiating solid tumor, necrotic region, edema region, normal brain tissue, and in grading the malignancy of cerebral astrocytomas. METHODS: Fourteen cases of astrocytomas diagnosed (10 cases of grade 1-2 astrocytomas and 4 cases of grade 3-4 astrocytomas) were studied by DTI. ADC, FA, and RA values of different tumor tissue were measured. RESULTS: When all cases were analyzed as a group, significant differences of ADC were found in enhancing solid tumor (1.14+/-0.13x10(-3) mm(2)/s), necrotic region (2.04+/-0.50x10(-3) mm(2)/s), edema region (1.55+/-0.19x10(-3) mm(2)/s) compared with normal brain tissue (0.74+/-0.08x10(-3) mm(2)/s)(P< 0.05). Significant differences of ADC were also found in solid tumor (enhancing tissue:1.14+/-0.13x10(-3) mm(2)/s, non-enhancing tissue:1.01+/-0.25x10(-3) mm(2)/s) compared with necrotic region and edema region, respectively (P< 0.05). Significant differences of FA and RA were found in solid enhancing region (FA:0.21+/-0.08; RA:0.23+/-0.07), necrotic region (FA: 0.14+/-0.06, RA: 0.16+/-0.07), edema region (FA:0.16+/-0.04, RA:0.16+/-0.02) compared with normal brain tissue (FA: 0.37+/-0.06, RA: 0.38+/-0.07) (P< 0.05). No difference of FA and RA was found in solid tumor (including enhancing and non-enhancing tissue). Significant differences of ADC (P< 0.05), not FA and RA, were found between grade 1-2 astrocytomas (1.07+/-0.04x10(-3) mm(2)/s) and grade 3-4 astrocytomas (1.32+/-0.08x10(-3) mm(2)/s). CONCLUSION: Determination of ADC can be used to differentiate normal brain tissue from enhancing solid tumor, necrotic region, and edema region. Determination of FA and RA can be used to differentiate solid enhancing tumor, necrotic region, and edema region from normal brain tissue, but can not be used to differentiate solid tumor, necrotic region, and edema region. The ADC values, not FA and RA, may predict the degree of malignancy of astrocytic tumors.
Key concepts: Effective diffusion coefficient, Diffusion MRI, Fractional anisotropy, Grading (engineering), Medicine, Brain tissue, Magnetic resonance imaging, Astrocytoma