1995•PubMedRequires access

Effect of patient-controlled sedation on recovery from ambulatory monitored anesthesia care.

Randall C. Cork, Guillory Ea, S Viswanathan, J E Eyrich, J. Heaton

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) with propofol has been shown to be an effective means of conscious sedation during monitored anesthesia care. The purpose of this study was to assess both the intraoperative conduct and postoperative recovery of patients receiving propofol for conscious sedation, randomized to either PCS or anesthetist-controlled sedation (ACS). Forty-three patients scheduled for outpatient procedures requiring monitored anesthesia care were randomized to PCS or ACS. Both groups received an initial bolus of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 microgram/kg i.v., followed by an identical background infusion of propofol 50 micrograms/kg per minute. Subsequent doses of propofol 30 mg i.v. were either self-administered (PCS) or administered at the discretion of the anesthetist (ACS). Variables measuring hemodynamics, ventilation, saturation, and level of sedation were measured at baseline, after initial bolus of propofol and fentanyl, after skin incision, at last stitch, at admission to recovery, and 1 hour later. More propofol was used by the PCS group (P < 0.05). Finger-tapping was slower and responsiveness scores were lower in the PCS group at the end of the procedure (P < 0.05). More patients in the PCS group required oxygen supplementation (saturation < 90%) on admission to recovery (P < 0.05). At 1 hour after recovery admission, however, there were no differences between groups. These results indicate that when patients determine their own sedation, they are more sedated at the end of a procedure than when the anesthetist determines the level of sedation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) with propofol has been shown to be an effective means of conscious sedation during monitored anesthesia care. The purpose of this study was to assess both the intraoperative conduct and postoperative recovery of patients receiving propofol for conscious sedation, randomized to either PCS or anesthetist-controlled sedation (ACS). Forty-three patients scheduled for outpatient procedures requiring monitored anesthesia care were randomized to PCS or ACS. Both groups received an initial bolus of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 microgram/kg i.v., followed by an identical background infusion of propofol 50 micrograms/kg per minute. Subsequent doses of propofol 30 mg i.v. were either self-administered (PCS) or administered at the discretion of the anesthetist (ACS). Variables measuring hemodynamics, ventilation, saturation, and level of sedation were measured at baseline, after initial bolus of propofol and fentanyl, after skin incision, at last stitch, at admission to recovery, and 1 hour later. More propofol was used by the PCS group (P < 0.05). Finger-tapping was slower and responsiveness scores were lower in the PCS group at the end of the procedure (P < 0.05). More patients in the PCS group required oxygen supplementation (saturation < 90%) on admission to recovery (P < 0.05). At 1 hour after recovery admission, however, there were no differences between groups. These results indicate that when patients determine their own sedation, they are more sedated at the end of a procedure than when the anesthetist determines the level of sedation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) with propofol has been shown to be an effective means of conscious sedation during monitored anesthesia care. The purpose of this study was to assess both the intraoperative conduct and postoperative recovery of patients receiving propofol for conscious sedation, randomized to either PCS or anesthetist-controlled sedation (ACS). Forty-three patients scheduled for outpatient procedures requiring monitored anesthesia care were randomized to PCS or ACS. Both groups received an initial bolus of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 microgram/kg i.v., followed by an identical background infusion of propofol 50 micrograms/kg per minute. Subsequent doses of propofol 30 mg i.v. were either self-administered (PCS) or administered at the discretion of the anesthetist (ACS). Variables measuring hemodynamics, ventilation, saturation, and level of sedation were measured at baseline, after initial bolus of propofol and fentanyl, after skin incision, at last stitch, at admission to recovery, and 1 hour later. More propofol was used by the PCS group (P < 0.05). Finger-tapping was slower and responsiveness scores were lower in the PCS group at the end of the procedure (P < 0.05). More patients in the PCS group required oxygen supplementation (saturation < 90%) on admission to recovery (P < 0.05). At 1 hour after recovery admission, however, there were no differences between groups. These results indicate that when patients determine their own sedation, they are more sedated at the end of a procedure than when the anesthetist determines the level of sedation.

Key concepts: Propofol, Sedation, Anesthesia, Medicine, Fentanyl, Ambulatory, Bolus (digestion), Midazolam

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of patient-controlled sedation on recovery from ambulatory monitored anesthesia care. — Research Paper | ScholarLens