2005Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological SocietyRequires access

The Outcomes After Indocyanine Green-assisted Peeling of the Internal Limiting Membrane in Macular Hole Surgery

I-Rum Hahm, Kee-Sun Tae, Sung Won Cho, Tae-Gon Lee, Soon-Hyun Kim, Jong-Woo Kim, Jae-Heung Lee

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether indocyanine green (ICG) staining of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) improves surgical and visual outcomes in macular hole surgery. Methods: Three consecutive groups of patients with stage 3 and stage 4 macular hole underwent standard vitrectomy. Group I (45 eyes) underwent an adjunctive peeling of ILM stained with intravitreal application of 0.1 ml of 0.5% ICG dye, group II (23 eyes) an adjunctive ILM peeling without use of ICG dye, and group III (23 eyes) no adjunctive technique. Postoperative anatomic closure rates of the hole and the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity improvement were compared among the groups. Results: The mean age was 61 years, and the mean follow-up period was 11 months. The rate of macular hole closure, as determined by optical coherence topography was 70% in group I, 61% in group II, and 61% in group III, and the difference were not statistically significant (p=0.726). The differences between preoperative and postoperative logMAR visual acuities among the three groups were not statistically significant (p=0.898). Conclusions: Intravitreal ICG-assisted ILM peeling did not improve anatomic outcomes in macular hole surgery. (Ed-confirm, something appears to be missing here)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: To investigate whether indocyanine green (ICG) staining of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) improves surgical and visual outcomes in macular hole surgery. Methods: Three consecutive groups of patients with stage 3 and stage 4 macular hole underwent standard vitrectomy. Group I (45 eyes) underwent an adjunctive peeling of ILM stained with intravitreal application of 0.1 ml of 0.5% ICG dye, group II (23 eyes) an adjunctive ILM peeling without use of ICG dye, and group III (23 eyes) no adjunctive technique. Postoperative anatomic closure rates of the hole and the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity improvement were compared among the groups. Results: The mean age was 61 years, and the mean follow-up period was 11 months. The rate of macular hole closure, as determined by optical coherence topography was 70% in group I, 61% in group II, and 61% in group III, and the difference were not statistically significant (p=0.726). The differences between preoperative and postoperative logMAR visual acuities among the three groups were not statistically significant (p=0.898). Conclusions: Intravitreal ICG-assisted ILM peeling did not improve anatomic outcomes in macular hole surgery. (Ed-confirm, something appears to be missing here)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether indocyanine green (ICG) staining of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) improves surgical and visual outcomes in macular hole surgery. Methods: Three consecutive groups of patients with stage 3 and stage 4 macular hole underwent standard vitrectomy. Group I (45 eyes) underwent an adjunctive peeling of ILM stained with intravitreal application of 0.1 ml of 0.5% ICG dye, group II (23 eyes) an adjunctive ILM peeling without use of ICG dye, and group III (23 eyes) no adjunctive technique. Postoperative anatomic closure rates of the hole and the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity improvement were compared among the groups. Results: The mean age was 61 years, and the mean follow-up period was 11 months. The rate of macular hole closure, as determined by optical coherence topography was 70% in group I, 61% in group II, and 61% in group III, and the difference were not statistically significant (p=0.726). The differences between preoperative and postoperative logMAR visual acuities among the three groups were not statistically significant (p=0.898). Conclusions: Intravitreal ICG-assisted ILM peeling did not improve anatomic outcomes in macular hole surgery. (Ed-confirm, something appears to be missing here)

Key concepts: Macular hole, Medicine, Indocyanine green, Internal limiting membrane, Vitrectomy, Visual acuity, Ophthalmology, Optical coherence tomography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Outcomes After Indocyanine Green-assisted Peeling of the Internal Limiting Membrane in Macular Hole Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens