1991•PubMedRequires access

Projected cost savings associated with cefmetazole: a new cephamycin for the hospitalized patient.

Vicki Swenson Crane

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

In this article, a cost-minimization model was used to make an economic comparison between cefmetazole and cefoxitin--two drugs with comparable in vitro spectra of activity, clinical efficacy, and safety profiles. Drug acquisition costs were estimated from published information and labor and material costs were calculated based on actual costs at Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas. Costs of the agents were calculated based on the dosage and administration schedules typically used in published clinical trials of cefmetazole and cefoxitin and on the typical dosing patterns of cefoxitin used at Presbyterian Hospital. Results of the cost analysis revealed that an annual savings of $36,015 to $59,143 could be realized at Presbyterian Hospital if cefmetazole were used in place of cefoxitin for surgical prophylaxis. Furthermore, use of cefmetazole in place of cefoxitin for wound treatment would yield annual savings of $33,242.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this article, a cost-minimization model was used to make an economic comparison between cefmetazole and cefoxitin--two drugs with comparable in vitro spectra of activity, clinical efficacy, and safety profiles. Drug acquisition costs were estimated from published information and labor and material costs were calculated based on actual costs at Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas. Costs of the agents were calculated based on the dosage and administration schedules typically used in published clinical trials of cefmetazole and cefoxitin and on the typical dosing patterns of cefoxitin used at Presbyterian Hospital. Results of the cost analysis revealed that an annual savings of $36,015 to $59,143 could be realized at Presbyterian Hospital if cefmetazole were used in place of cefoxitin for surgical prophylaxis. Furthermore, use of cefmetazole in place of cefoxitin for wound treatment would yield annual savings of $33,242.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this article, a cost-minimization model was used to make an economic comparison between cefmetazole and cefoxitin--two drugs with comparable in vitro spectra of activity, clinical efficacy, and safety profiles. Drug acquisition costs were estimated from published information and labor and material costs were calculated based on actual costs at Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas. Costs of the agents were calculated based on the dosage and administration schedules typically used in published clinical trials of cefmetazole and cefoxitin and on the typical dosing patterns of cefoxitin used at Presbyterian Hospital. Results of the cost analysis revealed that an annual savings of $36,015 to $59,143 could be realized at Presbyterian Hospital if cefmetazole were used in place of cefoxitin for surgical prophylaxis. Furthermore, use of cefmetazole in place of cefoxitin for wound treatment would yield annual savings of $33,242.

Key concepts: Cefmetazole, Cefoxitin, Medicine, Clinical trial, Intensive care medicine, Cephalosporin, Antibiotics, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Projected cost savings associated with cefmetazole: a new cephamycin for the hospitalized patient. — Research Paper | ScholarLens