1989•Journal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapyRequires access

Comparative intraoperative concentrations of two cephalosporins with activity against anaerobic bacteria

Joseph T. DiPiro, Jesse Connors, Talmadge A. Bowden, J. A. Stanfield, Bernhard M. Lampert, James T. Stewart

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

We determined the intraoperative concentrations of cefmetazole and cefoxitin in serum and muscle from the wound of 30 patients who were undergoing cholecystectomies. The study employed an open-label design in which all patients randomly received cefoxitin sodium (30 mg/kg) or cefmetazole sodium (15 or 30 mg/kg) intravenously with the induction of anesthesia. Total serum and wound-muscle concentrations achieved with cefmetazole 30 mg/kg were significantly greater than those achieved with a similar dose of cefoxitin. Cefmetazole in a 15 mg/kg dose was comparable with cefoxitin 30 mg/kg in achieved concentrations. The elimination half-life for cefoxitin was much shorter than that for cefmetazole (41 min v. 64-68 min, respectively) and this relates to a shorter duration of action for the former. The choice of agent for surgical prophylaxis should incorporate factors relating to drug pharmacokinetic properties as well as microbiological factors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We determined the intraoperative concentrations of cefmetazole and cefoxitin in serum and muscle from the wound of 30 patients who were undergoing cholecystectomies. The study employed an open-label design in which all patients randomly received cefoxitin sodium (30 mg/kg) or cefmetazole sodium (15 or 30 mg/kg) intravenously with the induction of anesthesia. Total serum and wound-muscle concentrations achieved with cefmetazole 30 mg/kg were significantly greater than those achieved with a similar dose of cefoxitin. Cefmetazole in a 15 mg/kg dose was comparable with cefoxitin 30 mg/kg in achieved concentrations. The elimination half-life for cefoxitin was much shorter than that for cefmetazole (41 min v. 64-68 min, respectively) and this relates to a shorter duration of action for the former. The choice of agent for surgical prophylaxis should incorporate factors relating to drug pharmacokinetic properties as well as microbiological factors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We determined the intraoperative concentrations of cefmetazole and cefoxitin in serum and muscle from the wound of 30 patients who were undergoing cholecystectomies. The study employed an open-label design in which all patients randomly received cefoxitin sodium (30 mg/kg) or cefmetazole sodium (15 or 30 mg/kg) intravenously with the induction of anesthesia. Total serum and wound-muscle concentrations achieved with cefmetazole 30 mg/kg were significantly greater than those achieved with a similar dose of cefoxitin. Cefmetazole in a 15 mg/kg dose was comparable with cefoxitin 30 mg/kg in achieved concentrations. The elimination half-life for cefoxitin was much shorter than that for cefmetazole (41 min v. 64-68 min, respectively) and this relates to a shorter duration of action for the former. The choice of agent for surgical prophylaxis should incorporate factors relating to drug pharmacokinetic properties as well as microbiological factors.

Key concepts: Cefoxitin, Cefmetazole, Medicine, Cephalosporin, Pharmacokinetics, Anesthesia, Antibiotics, Pharmacology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative intraoperative concentrations of two cephalosporins with activity against anaerobic bacteria — Research Paper | ScholarLens