1998•PubMedRequires access

[Comparison of the microdilution method (PASCO), the Etest and disc-diffusion in streptococcus pneumoniae antibiotic susceptibility testing].

Antonio Oliver, David Tarragó, Manuel Martínez-Ferrer, Elena Martínez Loza, Rafael Cantón, Fernando Baquero

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

MIC values and inhibition zone diameters for penicillin, cefotaxime, and erythromycin where determined in 75 consecutive Streptococcus pneumoniae blood isolates by microdilution (PASCO), disc-diffusion and Etest. Using the Etest, 40% and 29.3% of the isolates showed low- or high-level resistance to penicillin and erythromycin respectively, whereas 9.3% were intermediate to cefotaxime. No high-level resistance to cefotaxime was found. No errors were found with the comparison of penicillin and cefotaxime results by microdilution and Etest, with just 2 (2.7%) and 3 (4%) minor errors appearing respectively. On the other hand, when comparing penicillin susceptibility results by disc-diffusion (1 mg oxacillin disc) and Etest, 6 (8%) major errors and 18 (24%) minor errors were found.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

MIC values and inhibition zone diameters for penicillin, cefotaxime, and erythromycin where determined in 75 consecutive Streptococcus pneumoniae blood isolates by microdilution (PASCO), disc-diffusion and Etest. Using the Etest, 40% and 29.3% of the isolates showed low- or high-level resistance to penicillin and erythromycin respectively, whereas 9.3% were intermediate to cefotaxime. No high-level resistance to cefotaxime was found. No errors were found with the comparison of penicillin and cefotaxime results by microdilution and Etest, with just 2 (2.7%) and 3 (4%) minor errors appearing respectively. On the other hand, when comparing penicillin susceptibility results by disc-diffusion (1 mg oxacillin disc) and Etest, 6 (8%) major errors and 18 (24%) minor errors were found.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

MIC values and inhibition zone diameters for penicillin, cefotaxime, and erythromycin where determined in 75 consecutive Streptococcus pneumoniae blood isolates by microdilution (PASCO), disc-diffusion and Etest. Using the Etest, 40% and 29.3% of the isolates showed low- or high-level resistance to penicillin and erythromycin respectively, whereas 9.3% were intermediate to cefotaxime. No high-level resistance to cefotaxime was found. No errors were found with the comparison of penicillin and cefotaxime results by microdilution and Etest, with just 2 (2.7%) and 3 (4%) minor errors appearing respectively. On the other hand, when comparing penicillin susceptibility results by disc-diffusion (1 mg oxacillin disc) and Etest, 6 (8%) major errors and 18 (24%) minor errors were found.

Key concepts: Etest, Cefotaxime, Broth microdilution, Penicillin, Microbiology, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Erythromycin, Antibiotics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison of the microdilution method (PASCO), the Etest and disc-diffusion in streptococcus pneumoniae antibiotic susceptibility testing]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens