[Speech rehabilitation after laryngectomy, primary insertion of a speech ventilator].
Balle Vh, Jens Christian Thomsen
Abstract
Balle Vh, Jens Christian Thomsen
Abstract
During a period of three years, 30 patients were submitted to laryngectomy in our department. In 23 of these, primary tracho-oesophageal puncture had been performed and secondary puncture was performed in one patient. Fifteen of the prostheses were of the Blom Singer type and nine were Provox prostheses. Twenty-one patients learned to use the voice prosthesis and obtained fluent or understandable speech while three patients never used the prosthesis. Three patients subsequently abandoned the speech prosthesis and preferred to continue using oesophageal speech. Side effects were restricted to leakage around the prosthesis and slight stenosis in the pharyngo-oesophageal segment.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
During a period of three years, 30 patients were submitted to laryngectomy in our department. In 23 of these, primary tracho-oesophageal puncture had been performed and secondary puncture was performed in one patient. Fifteen of the prostheses were of the Blom Singer type and nine were Provox prostheses. Twenty-one patients learned to use the voice prosthesis and obtained fluent or understandable speech while three patients never used the prosthesis. Three patients subsequently abandoned the speech prosthesis and preferred to continue using oesophageal speech. Side effects were restricted to leakage around the prosthesis and slight stenosis in the pharyngo-oesophageal segment.
Key concepts: Voice prosthesis, Laryngectomy, Prosthesis, Medicine, Esophageal speech, Rehabilitation, Surgery, Stenosis