1993•PubMedRequires access

[Speech rehabilitation after laryngectomy, primary insertion of a speech ventilator].

Balle Vh, Jens Christian Thomsen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

During a period of three years, 30 patients were submitted to laryngectomy in our department. In 23 of these, primary tracho-oesophageal puncture had been performed and secondary puncture was performed in one patient. Fifteen of the prostheses were of the Blom Singer type and nine were Provox prostheses. Twenty-one patients learned to use the voice prosthesis and obtained fluent or understandable speech while three patients never used the prosthesis. Three patients subsequently abandoned the speech prosthesis and preferred to continue using oesophageal speech. Side effects were restricted to leakage around the prosthesis and slight stenosis in the pharyngo-oesophageal segment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

During a period of three years, 30 patients were submitted to laryngectomy in our department. In 23 of these, primary tracho-oesophageal puncture had been performed and secondary puncture was performed in one patient. Fifteen of the prostheses were of the Blom Singer type and nine were Provox prostheses. Twenty-one patients learned to use the voice prosthesis and obtained fluent or understandable speech while three patients never used the prosthesis. Three patients subsequently abandoned the speech prosthesis and preferred to continue using oesophageal speech. Side effects were restricted to leakage around the prosthesis and slight stenosis in the pharyngo-oesophageal segment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

During a period of three years, 30 patients were submitted to laryngectomy in our department. In 23 of these, primary tracho-oesophageal puncture had been performed and secondary puncture was performed in one patient. Fifteen of the prostheses were of the Blom Singer type and nine were Provox prostheses. Twenty-one patients learned to use the voice prosthesis and obtained fluent or understandable speech while three patients never used the prosthesis. Three patients subsequently abandoned the speech prosthesis and preferred to continue using oesophageal speech. Side effects were restricted to leakage around the prosthesis and slight stenosis in the pharyngo-oesophageal segment.

Key concepts: Voice prosthesis, Laryngectomy, Prosthesis, Medicine, Esophageal speech, Rehabilitation, Surgery, Stenosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Speech rehabilitation after laryngectomy, primary insertion of a speech ventilator]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens