1992PubMedRequires access

[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy--benefit or risk?].

Wieden Te, Julie L. Gerberding, Weiser Hf

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A comparing observation between 600 patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 921 conventionally operated patients reveals that while achieving the same standard of results, the laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not lead to an increased rate of complications. With the operating time slightly prolonged, there is quick freedom from pain, short hospitalization and a short period of convalescence. Thus the laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to meet the standard of conventional cholecystectomy despite higher demands regarding personnel and materials. It is not only characterized by being better accepted by the patient, but also seems to represent an adequate therapy for symptomatic cholelithiasis from the economic point of view.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A comparing observation between 600 patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 921 conventionally operated patients reveals that while achieving the same standard of results, the laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not lead to an increased rate of complications. With the operating time slightly prolonged, there is quick freedom from pain, short hospitalization and a short period of convalescence. Thus the laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to meet the standard of conventional cholecystectomy despite higher demands regarding personnel and materials. It is not only characterized by being better accepted by the patient, but also seems to represent an adequate therapy for symptomatic cholelithiasis from the economic point of view.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A comparing observation between 600 patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 921 conventionally operated patients reveals that while achieving the same standard of results, the laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not lead to an increased rate of complications. With the operating time slightly prolonged, there is quick freedom from pain, short hospitalization and a short period of convalescence. Thus the laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to meet the standard of conventional cholecystectomy despite higher demands regarding personnel and materials. It is not only characterized by being better accepted by the patient, but also seems to represent an adequate therapy for symptomatic cholelithiasis from the economic point of view.

Key concepts: Medicine, Convalescence, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Cholecystectomy, General surgery, Surgery, Laparoscopy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy--benefit or risk?]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens