1995British journal of surgeryRequires access

Return to work after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

G. McLauchlan, I. MacIntyre

Open publisher page 32 citations

Abstract

To assess whether the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to a change in attitude regarding the resumption of normal activities after operation, the views of 407 general practitioners (GPs) and 532 patients were analysed. Although 99 per cent of GPs thought that laparoscopic cholecystectomy represented an improvement on the open operation, 55 per cent advised significant restrictions in the postoperative period. For the 231 patients in employment who had an uncomplicated laparoscopic procedure the mean time of return to work was 3.3 weeks. Although 47 per cent of patients returned to work within 2 weeks, 19 per cent took more than 4 weeks. The self-employed returned significantly earlier than employees. Education through better communication among hospital, general practitioners and patients is required if prevailing attitudes towards the length of convalescence after laparoscopic cholecystectomy are to change.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To assess whether the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to a change in attitude regarding the resumption of normal activities after operation, the views of 407 general practitioners (GPs) and 532 patients were analysed. Although 99 per cent of GPs thought that laparoscopic cholecystectomy represented an improvement on the open operation, 55 per cent advised significant restrictions in the postoperative period. For the 231 patients in employment who had an uncomplicated laparoscopic procedure the mean time of return to work was 3.3 weeks. Although 47 per cent of patients returned to work within 2 weeks, 19 per cent took more than 4 weeks. The self-employed returned significantly earlier than employees. Education through better communication among hospital, general practitioners and patients is required if prevailing attitudes towards the length of convalescence after laparoscopic cholecystectomy are to change.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To assess whether the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to a change in attitude regarding the resumption of normal activities after operation, the views of 407 general practitioners (GPs) and 532 patients were analysed. Although 99 per cent of GPs thought that laparoscopic cholecystectomy represented an improvement on the open operation, 55 per cent advised significant restrictions in the postoperative period. For the 231 patients in employment who had an uncomplicated laparoscopic procedure the mean time of return to work was 3.3 weeks. Although 47 per cent of patients returned to work within 2 weeks, 19 per cent took more than 4 weeks. The self-employed returned significantly earlier than employees. Education through better communication among hospital, general practitioners and patients is required if prevailing attitudes towards the length of convalescence after laparoscopic cholecystectomy are to change.

Key concepts: Medicine, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, General surgery, Cholecystectomy, Work (physics), Surgery, Mechanical engineering, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Return to work after laparoscopic cholecystectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens