2004Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological SocietyRequires access

Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Using Indocyanine Green in Vitrectomy for Idiopathic Macular Hole

Byoung-Yong Song, Kyuyoun Ahn, Man-Seong Seo

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling using indocyanine green (ICG) on the surgical results of the vitrectomy for idiopathic macular holes. Methods: We analyzed the anatomical and functional results of the macular hole surgeries without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (group I; 32 eyes) and with ILM peeling using ICG (group II; 22 eyes). Results: In group I and group II, mean age was 62 years and 64 years, and follow-up period was 17 months and 8 months, respectively. Anatomical success (P =0.528); 28 eyes (87.5%) vs. 20 eyes (90.9%), mean best visual acuity (P=0.004); 0.41 vs. 0.26, final visual acuity (P=0.006); 0.32 vs. 0.16, improvemant of best visual acuity (P=0.051); 2.88 lines vs. 1.59 lines, improvement of final visual acuity (P=0.048); 1.97 lines vs. 0.82 lines, and functional success rate (P=0.063); 24 eyes (75.0%) vs. 12 eyes (54.5%) were shown. Visual acuities better than 0.4 were found in 12 eyes (37.5%) of group I and in 5 eyes (22.7%) of group II (P=0.001). Conclusions: ILM peeling using ICG might produce a negative effect on the functional results, thereby requiring care with handling ICG.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling using indocyanine green (ICG) on the surgical results of the vitrectomy for idiopathic macular holes. Methods: We analyzed the anatomical and functional results of the macular hole surgeries without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (group I; 32 eyes) and with ILM peeling using ICG (group II; 22 eyes). Results: In group I and group II, mean age was 62 years and 64 years, and follow-up period was 17 months and 8 months, respectively. Anatomical success (P =0.528); 28 eyes (87.5%) vs. 20 eyes (90.9%), mean best visual acuity (P=0.004); 0.41 vs. 0.26, final visual acuity (P=0.006); 0.32 vs. 0.16, improvemant of best visual acuity (P=0.051); 2.88 lines vs. 1.59 lines, improvement of final visual acuity (P=0.048); 1.97 lines vs. 0.82 lines, and functional success rate (P=0.063); 24 eyes (75.0%) vs. 12 eyes (54.5%) were shown. Visual acuities better than 0.4 were found in 12 eyes (37.5%) of group I and in 5 eyes (22.7%) of group II (P=0.001). Conclusions: ILM peeling using ICG might produce a negative effect on the functional results, thereby requiring care with handling ICG.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling using indocyanine green (ICG) on the surgical results of the vitrectomy for idiopathic macular holes. Methods: We analyzed the anatomical and functional results of the macular hole surgeries without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (group I; 32 eyes) and with ILM peeling using ICG (group II; 22 eyes). Results: In group I and group II, mean age was 62 years and 64 years, and follow-up period was 17 months and 8 months, respectively. Anatomical success (P =0.528); 28 eyes (87.5%) vs. 20 eyes (90.9%), mean best visual acuity (P=0.004); 0.41 vs. 0.26, final visual acuity (P=0.006); 0.32 vs. 0.16, improvemant of best visual acuity (P=0.051); 2.88 lines vs. 1.59 lines, improvement of final visual acuity (P=0.048); 1.97 lines vs. 0.82 lines, and functional success rate (P=0.063); 24 eyes (75.0%) vs. 12 eyes (54.5%) were shown. Visual acuities better than 0.4 were found in 12 eyes (37.5%) of group I and in 5 eyes (22.7%) of group II (P=0.001). Conclusions: ILM peeling using ICG might produce a negative effect on the functional results, thereby requiring care with handling ICG.

Key concepts: Internal limiting membrane, Indocyanine green, Medicine, Vitrectomy, Macular hole, Visual acuity, Ophthalmology, Limiting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Using Indocyanine Green in Vitrectomy for Idiopathic Macular Hole — Research Paper | ScholarLens