1993PubMedRequires access

[Multicenter clinical, double blind, and randomized study to assess the effectiveness and safety of binifibrate versus gemfibrozil in type IIa, IIb, and IV hyperlipidemia].

Augusto Corominas Vilardell, M de Oya Otero, Fernando Escobar Jiménez, Andrew Vila, B Ariño Armengol

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

A multicentric, double-blind and randomized clinical study was conducted on a total of 54 patients with hyperlipidemias type IIa, IIb and IV in order to compare the effectivity and tolerance of two hyperlipemiant drugs: Binifibrate and Gemfibrozil. The treatment had a length of six months, performing clinical and analytical controls at: baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 4 months and 6 months. Both drugs showed a very good tolerance and the following results were obtained: Total cholesterol: Binifibrate -21.9%, Gemfibrozil -20.5%; Triglycerides: Binifibrate -48.6%, Gemfibrozil -43.27%; HDL: Binifibrate +18.2%, Gemfibrozil -12.8%; LDL: Binifibrate -24.3%, Gemfibrozil -22.8% VLDL: Binifibrate -48%, Gemfibrozil -43.2%; Apo A: Binifibrate +133.5%, Gemfibrozil +108.1%; Apo B: Binifibrate -59.7%, Gemfibrozil -46%. Both treatment were very effective, although the greater increase produced by Binifibrate on Chol-HDL, with a statistically significant difference versus the increase produced by Gemfibrozil, must be highlighted.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A multicentric, double-blind and randomized clinical study was conducted on a total of 54 patients with hyperlipidemias type IIa, IIb and IV in order to compare the effectivity and tolerance of two hyperlipemiant drugs: Binifibrate and Gemfibrozil. The treatment had a length of six months, performing clinical and analytical controls at: baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 4 months and 6 months. Both drugs showed a very good tolerance and the following results were obtained: Total cholesterol: Binifibrate -21.9%, Gemfibrozil -20.5%; Triglycerides: Binifibrate -48.6%, Gemfibrozil -43.27%; HDL: Binifibrate +18.2%, Gemfibrozil -12.8%; LDL: Binifibrate -24.3%, Gemfibrozil -22.8% VLDL: Binifibrate -48%, Gemfibrozil -43.2%; Apo A: Binifibrate +133.5%, Gemfibrozil +108.1%; Apo B: Binifibrate -59.7%, Gemfibrozil -46%. Both treatment were very effective, although the greater increase produced by Binifibrate on Chol-HDL, with a statistically significant difference versus the increase produced by Gemfibrozil, must be highlighted.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A multicentric, double-blind and randomized clinical study was conducted on a total of 54 patients with hyperlipidemias type IIa, IIb and IV in order to compare the effectivity and tolerance of two hyperlipemiant drugs: Binifibrate and Gemfibrozil. The treatment had a length of six months, performing clinical and analytical controls at: baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 4 months and 6 months. Both drugs showed a very good tolerance and the following results were obtained: Total cholesterol: Binifibrate -21.9%, Gemfibrozil -20.5%; Triglycerides: Binifibrate -48.6%, Gemfibrozil -43.27%; HDL: Binifibrate +18.2%, Gemfibrozil -12.8%; LDL: Binifibrate -24.3%, Gemfibrozil -22.8% VLDL: Binifibrate -48%, Gemfibrozil -43.2%; Apo A: Binifibrate +133.5%, Gemfibrozil +108.1%; Apo B: Binifibrate -59.7%, Gemfibrozil -46%. Both treatment were very effective, although the greater increase produced by Binifibrate on Chol-HDL, with a statistically significant difference versus the increase produced by Gemfibrozil, must be highlighted.

Key concepts: Gemfibrozil, Medicine, Hyperlipidemia, Internal medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Clinical trial, Gastroenterology, Cholesterol

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Multicenter clinical, double blind, and randomized study to assess the effectiveness and safety of binifibrate versus gemfibrozil in type IIa, IIb, and IV hyperlipidemia]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens