2016Journal of Clinical Laboratory AnalysisOpen access

A Comparison of Mindray BC ‐6800, Sysmex XN ‐2000, and Beckman Coulter LH 750 Automated Hematology Analyzers: A Pediatric Study

Olga Ciepiela, Iwona Kotuła, Szymon Kierat, Sandra Sieczkowska, Anna Podsiadłowska, Anna Jenczelewska, Karolina Księżarczyk, Urszula Demkow

Open full text 26 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern automated laboratory hematology analyzers allow the measurement of over 30 different hematological parameters useful in the diagnostic and clinical interpretation of patient symptoms. They use different methods to measure the same parameters. Thus, a comparison of complete blood count made by Mindray BC-6800, Sysmex XN-2000 and Beckman Coulter LH750 was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparison of results obtained by automated analysis of 807 anticoagulated blood samples from children and 125 manual microscopic differentiations were performed. This comparative study included white blood cell count, red blood cell count, and erythrocyte indices, as well as platelet count. RESULTS: The present study showed a poor level of agreement between white blood cell enumeration and differentiation of the three automated hematology analyzers under comparison. A very good agreement was found when comparing manual blood smear and automated granulocytes, monocytes, and lymphocytes differentiation. Red blood cell evaluation showed better agreement than white blood cells between the studied analyzers. CONCLUSION: To conclude, studied instruments did not ensure satisfactory interchangeability and did not facilitate a substitution of one analyzer by another.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Modern automated laboratory hematology analyzers allow the measurement of over 30 different hematological parameters useful in the diagnostic and clinical interpretation of patient symptoms. They use different methods to measure the same parameters. Thus, a comparison of complete blood count made by Mindray BC-6800, Sysmex XN-2000 and Beckman Coulter LH750 was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparison of results obtained by automated analysis of 807 anticoagulated blood samples from children and 125 manual microscopic differentiations were performed. This comparative study included white blood cell count, red blood cell count, and erythrocyte indices, as well as platelet count. RESULTS: The present study showed a poor level of agreement between white blood cell enumeration and differentiation of the three automated hematology analyzers under comparison. A very good agreement was found when comparing manual blood smear and automated granulocytes, monocytes, and lymphocytes differentiation. Red blood cell evaluation showed better agreement than white blood cells between the studied analyzers. CONCLUSION: To conclude, studied instruments did not ensure satisfactory interchangeability and did not facilitate a substitution of one analyzer by another.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern automated laboratory hematology analyzers allow the measurement of over 30 different hematological parameters useful in the diagnostic and clinical interpretation of patient symptoms. They use different methods to measure the same parameters. Thus, a comparison of complete blood count made by Mindray BC-6800, Sysmex XN-2000 and Beckman Coulter LH750 was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparison of results obtained by automated analysis of 807 anticoagulated blood samples from children and 125 manual microscopic differentiations were performed. This comparative study included white blood cell count, red blood cell count, and erythrocyte indices, as well as platelet count. RESULTS: The present study showed a poor level of agreement between white blood cell enumeration and differentiation of the three automated hematology analyzers under comparison. A very good agreement was found when comparing manual blood smear and automated granulocytes, monocytes, and lymphocytes differentiation. Red blood cell evaluation showed better agreement than white blood cells between the studied analyzers. CONCLUSION: To conclude, studied instruments did not ensure satisfactory interchangeability and did not facilitate a substitution of one analyzer by another.

Key concepts: Hematology analyzer, White blood cell, Hematology, Complete blood count, Enumeration, Blood cell, Medicine, Blood count

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of Mindray BC ‐6800, Sysmex XN ‐2000, and Beckman Coulter LH 750 Automated Hematology Analyzers: A Pediatric Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens