2011China Municipal EngineeringRequires access

Static & Dynamic Comparative Analysis of Large-span Cable-stayed Bridge Based on Different Computation Models

Sun Bing-nan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

With a large-span cross-sea cable-stayed bridge as the research object,the finite element modeling methods of the towers,cables,bridge deck system and boundary condition are introduced in this paper.The tower and cable share the same modeling method;the bridge deck system adopts 3 kinds of modeling methods including the single-girder model,triple-girder model and plate-beam composite model.The calculations of static force displacement and main girder stress state are presented.After a comparison of these data,the differences of three different methods of finite element modeling are pointed out and the difference causes are analyzed.The actual measurement frequency being contrasted with the former 12 frequency of 3 calculation modes,the calculations of plate-beam composite pattern will be more accurate and the simulation modes of single-girder model and triple-girder model are equivalent in a sense.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

With a large-span cross-sea cable-stayed bridge as the research object,the finite element modeling methods of the towers,cables,bridge deck system and boundary condition are introduced in this paper.The tower and cable share the same modeling method;the bridge deck system adopts 3 kinds of modeling methods including the single-girder model,triple-girder model and plate-beam composite model.The calculations of static force displacement and main girder stress state are presented.After a comparison of these data,the differences of three different methods of finite element modeling are pointed out and the difference causes are analyzed.The actual measurement frequency being contrasted with the former 12 frequency of 3 calculation modes,the calculations of plate-beam composite pattern will be more accurate and the simulation modes of single-girder model and triple-girder model are equivalent in a sense.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

With a large-span cross-sea cable-stayed bridge as the research object,the finite element modeling methods of the towers,cables,bridge deck system and boundary condition are introduced in this paper.The tower and cable share the same modeling method;the bridge deck system adopts 3 kinds of modeling methods including the single-girder model,triple-girder model and plate-beam composite model.The calculations of static force displacement and main girder stress state are presented.After a comparison of these data,the differences of three different methods of finite element modeling are pointed out and the difference causes are analyzed.The actual measurement frequency being contrasted with the former 12 frequency of 3 calculation modes,the calculations of plate-beam composite pattern will be more accurate and the simulation modes of single-girder model and triple-girder model are equivalent in a sense.

Key concepts: Structural engineering, Girder, Deck, Finite element method, Span (engineering), Bridge (graph theory), Displacement (psychology), Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Static & Dynamic Comparative Analysis of Large-span Cable-stayed Bridge Based on Different Computation Models — Research Paper | ScholarLens