2011Journal of Wuyi UniversityRequires access

A Review of Liang Qichao's Research into Qing Academic History

Lei Pin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Liang Qichao is an important figure in the research on Qing academic history. He paid great attention to the investigation of the ethos of the times, made an attempt to compare and contrast it with the history of western learning, and made original interpretations of the origin, schools, and methods of the Qing learning. But Liang's research also has many shortcomings, mainly in his simplistic comparison between Chinese and western learning and his cutting off the relationship between Qing learning and the neo-Confucianism of the Song and Ming dynasties. Also, lack of document preparation leads to emptiness and shallowness in his argumentation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Liang Qichao is an important figure in the research on Qing academic history. He paid great attention to the investigation of the ethos of the times, made an attempt to compare and contrast it with the history of western learning, and made original interpretations of the origin, schools, and methods of the Qing learning. But Liang's research also has many shortcomings, mainly in his simplistic comparison between Chinese and western learning and his cutting off the relationship between Qing learning and the neo-Confucianism of the Song and Ming dynasties. Also, lack of document preparation leads to emptiness and shallowness in his argumentation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Liang Qichao is an important figure in the research on Qing academic history. He paid great attention to the investigation of the ethos of the times, made an attempt to compare and contrast it with the history of western learning, and made original interpretations of the origin, schools, and methods of the Qing learning. But Liang's research also has many shortcomings, mainly in his simplistic comparison between Chinese and western learning and his cutting off the relationship between Qing learning and the neo-Confucianism of the Song and Ming dynasties. Also, lack of document preparation leads to emptiness and shallowness in his argumentation.

Key concepts: Emptiness, Ethos, Argumentation theory, Psychology, History, Aesthetics, Epistemology, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Review of Liang Qichao's Research into Qing Academic History — Research Paper | ScholarLens