2015•Beifang faxueRequires access

Review on Judicial Practice of Burden of Proof in Environmental Torts Cases——Based on the Analysis of 60 Cases

Luo Fa-xin

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In light of the rather general regulations by law,judicial practice has gradually developed positive and feasible rules on burden of proof pertinent to tortious conducts,damages and causation in environmental torts cases. In case that the amount of damage is determined by discretion,judges should inform the parties concerned their procedural interests to know and to debate. With regard to claims for pollution- related diseases,different rules should be applied in different situations,such as shifting burden of proof,causation of epidemiology and proportionate determination.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In light of the rather general regulations by law,judicial practice has gradually developed positive and feasible rules on burden of proof pertinent to tortious conducts,damages and causation in environmental torts cases. In case that the amount of damage is determined by discretion,judges should inform the parties concerned their procedural interests to know and to debate. With regard to claims for pollution- related diseases,different rules should be applied in different situations,such as shifting burden of proof,causation of epidemiology and proportionate determination.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In light of the rather general regulations by law,judicial practice has gradually developed positive and feasible rules on burden of proof pertinent to tortious conducts,damages and causation in environmental torts cases. In case that the amount of damage is determined by discretion,judges should inform the parties concerned their procedural interests to know and to debate. With regard to claims for pollution- related diseases,different rules should be applied in different situations,such as shifting burden of proof,causation of epidemiology and proportionate determination.

Key concepts: Causation, Damages, Burden of proof, Discretion, Law, Law and economics, Judicial review, Judicial discretion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Review on Judicial Practice of Burden of Proof in Environmental Torts Cases——Based on the Analysis of 60 Cases — Research Paper | ScholarLens