2015•Unpublished venueRequires access

On the Distribution of Burden of Proof on Causation in Environmental Torts of China

Tong Guang-f

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

There are different views on causation in environmental torts of China.According to article 66 of Tort Law,it should be inversion of burden of proof or causation presumption.To advocate the former,the burden of proof should be shifted from victims to polluters completely through the literal meaning of the article;whereas the advocate of causation presumption thinks the victims should take the burden of evidence of basic facts by considering the legal policy.To distribute the burden of proof on causation in environmental torts scientifically,we need consider the value and goal of Tort Law and balance the different benefits of victims and polluters.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There are different views on causation in environmental torts of China.According to article 66 of Tort Law,it should be inversion of burden of proof or causation presumption.To advocate the former,the burden of proof should be shifted from victims to polluters completely through the literal meaning of the article;whereas the advocate of causation presumption thinks the victims should take the burden of evidence of basic facts by considering the legal policy.To distribute the burden of proof on causation in environmental torts scientifically,we need consider the value and goal of Tort Law and balance the different benefits of victims and polluters.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There are different views on causation in environmental torts of China.According to article 66 of Tort Law,it should be inversion of burden of proof or causation presumption.To advocate the former,the burden of proof should be shifted from victims to polluters completely through the literal meaning of the article;whereas the advocate of causation presumption thinks the victims should take the burden of evidence of basic facts by considering the legal policy.To distribute the burden of proof on causation in environmental torts scientifically,we need consider the value and goal of Tort Law and balance the different benefits of victims and polluters.

Key concepts: Presumption, Causation, Burden of proof, Tort, Tort reform, Law and economics, China, Balance (ability)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Distribution of Burden of Proof on Causation in Environmental Torts of China — Research Paper | ScholarLens