2006PubMedRequires access

[Value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing breast lesions which need biopsy].

Hong Ling, Ya Jia Gu, Xiao hong Wang, Guang yu Liu, Ouhan Huang, Li ping Wang, Kun Wei Shen, Zhen Shen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate MRI in diagnosing breast lesions which need biopsy. METHODS: One hundred and eight patients were admitted to hospital for biopsies due to one hundred and sixteen suspicious lesions detected in their breasts. These lesions were detected by physical examination, mammography or ultrasonography. They were also administrated MRI examination before biopsy. The sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic method were obtained and the radiologic-pathologic correlation was meanwhile calculated. RESULTS: Seventy (60.3%) breast lesions were diagnosed malignancy. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive prognostic value and negative prognostic value of ultrasonography were 83.3%, 62.0%, 74.1%, 74.3% and 73.8%. Such data of mammography were 86.8%, 68.1%, 78.0%, 75.4% and 82.1%. And those of MRI were 97.1%, 73.9%, 87.9%, 85.0% and 94.4%. CONCLUSION: MRI is superior to ultrasonography and mammography in diagnosing breast lesions, especially for the nonpalpable lesions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate MRI in diagnosing breast lesions which need biopsy. METHODS: One hundred and eight patients were admitted to hospital for biopsies due to one hundred and sixteen suspicious lesions detected in their breasts. These lesions were detected by physical examination, mammography or ultrasonography. They were also administrated MRI examination before biopsy. The sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic method were obtained and the radiologic-pathologic correlation was meanwhile calculated. RESULTS: Seventy (60.3%) breast lesions were diagnosed malignancy. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive prognostic value and negative prognostic value of ultrasonography were 83.3%, 62.0%, 74.1%, 74.3% and 73.8%. Such data of mammography were 86.8%, 68.1%, 78.0%, 75.4% and 82.1%. And those of MRI were 97.1%, 73.9%, 87.9%, 85.0% and 94.4%. CONCLUSION: MRI is superior to ultrasonography and mammography in diagnosing breast lesions, especially for the nonpalpable lesions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate MRI in diagnosing breast lesions which need biopsy. METHODS: One hundred and eight patients were admitted to hospital for biopsies due to one hundred and sixteen suspicious lesions detected in their breasts. These lesions were detected by physical examination, mammography or ultrasonography. They were also administrated MRI examination before biopsy. The sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic method were obtained and the radiologic-pathologic correlation was meanwhile calculated. RESULTS: Seventy (60.3%) breast lesions were diagnosed malignancy. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive prognostic value and negative prognostic value of ultrasonography were 83.3%, 62.0%, 74.1%, 74.3% and 73.8%. Such data of mammography were 86.8%, 68.1%, 78.0%, 75.4% and 82.1%. And those of MRI were 97.1%, 73.9%, 87.9%, 85.0% and 94.4%. CONCLUSION: MRI is superior to ultrasonography and mammography in diagnosing breast lesions, especially for the nonpalpable lesions.

Key concepts: Medicine, Mammography, Radiology, Malignancy, Biopsy, Magnetic resonance imaging, Ultrasonography, Physical examination

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing breast lesions which need biopsy]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens