2003Beijing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Real-learning Thought in Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi's Neo-confucianism

Pang Wan-li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper probes into the real-learning thought in Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi's rationalism system. In ontology, Cheng brothers' real-reason is different to Buddhism and Taoist school's empty noumena. In the theory of Gongfu, Cheng brothers maintained the real cultivation of Gongfu, the genuine knowledge of reason through personal investigation of things and practice, and participation in the real affairs of managing state. Cheng brothers thought that study of Confucian classics was close to the original meanings, and Cheng Yi said that study of Confucian classics was real-learning. They affirmed people's basic passion, desire and interest, advocated simple and unadorned style of study. Cheng brothers' thought of real learning is the source of real-learning of the Ming and Qing Dynasties.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper probes into the real-learning thought in Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi's rationalism system. In ontology, Cheng brothers' real-reason is different to Buddhism and Taoist school's empty noumena. In the theory of Gongfu, Cheng brothers maintained the real cultivation of Gongfu, the genuine knowledge of reason through personal investigation of things and practice, and participation in the real affairs of managing state. Cheng brothers thought that study of Confucian classics was close to the original meanings, and Cheng Yi said that study of Confucian classics was real-learning. They affirmed people's basic passion, desire and interest, advocated simple and unadorned style of study. Cheng brothers' thought of real learning is the source of real-learning of the Ming and Qing Dynasties.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper probes into the real-learning thought in Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi's rationalism system. In ontology, Cheng brothers' real-reason is different to Buddhism and Taoist school's empty noumena. In the theory of Gongfu, Cheng brothers maintained the real cultivation of Gongfu, the genuine knowledge of reason through personal investigation of things and practice, and participation in the real affairs of managing state. Cheng brothers thought that study of Confucian classics was close to the original meanings, and Cheng Yi said that study of Confucian classics was real-learning. They affirmed people's basic passion, desire and interest, advocated simple and unadorned style of study. Cheng brothers' thought of real learning is the source of real-learning of the Ming and Qing Dynasties.

Key concepts: Neo-Confucianism, Passion, Philosophy, Buddhism, Style (visual arts), Ontology, Rationalism, Theology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Real-learning Thought in Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi's Neo-confucianism — Research Paper | ScholarLens