Hu Qiu-yuan:Guardian of Literature Self-discipline
Wei Wang
Abstract
Wei Wang
Abstract
Up to now,academic circle generally denies so-calledThird Partyin the 1930s controversy of literary freedom,but Hu Qiu-yuan's criticism whether to National Literary Theory or to theory of Qian Xing-cun is to defend literature self-discipline actually.This does not mean that he does not recognize the relations between literature and politics,literature and classes.His bottom line is heteronymous power can't do harm to the form of art.Although the above views could rectify the prejudice of Left-wing Literature of the day,the debate with a bit ofno senseis inevitable because of the great derisive tone of Hu's article and high-profile support of Su Wen.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Up to now,academic circle generally denies so-calledThird Partyin the 1930s controversy of literary freedom,but Hu Qiu-yuan's criticism whether to National Literary Theory or to theory of Qian Xing-cun is to defend literature self-discipline actually.This does not mean that he does not recognize the relations between literature and politics,literature and classes.His bottom line is heteronymous power can't do harm to the form of art.Although the above views could rectify the prejudice of Left-wing Literature of the day,the debate with a bit ofno senseis inevitable because of the great derisive tone of Hu's article and high-profile support of Su Wen.
Key concepts: Criticism, Guardian, Politics, Power (physics), Harm, Tone (literature), Prejudice (legal term), Literary criticism