2015Journal of reproductive medicineRequires access

Clinical value of transferring frozen-thawed Day-3 non-top quality embryo

Ding Jin-l

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To analyze the clinical value of transferring frozen-thawed non-top quality embryo.Methods:The data of 346frozen-thawed embryo transfer(FET)cycles were analyzed retrospectively.All the cycles were divided into two groups according to the quality of Day-3embryo:top quality embryo group(202cycle)and non-top quality embryo groups(144cycles).The pregnancy and implantation rate and other affecting factors were compared between the two groups.The results of non-top quality embryos after thawed and cultured were observed.Results:The age of the women in the non-top quality embryo group was significantly higher than that of the top quality group [(32.08±4.39)vs.(30.48±4.23)years](P0.05).The undeveloped embryo rate in the non-top quality embryo group was significantly higher than that of the top embryo group(26.54% vs.15.52%),while the blastocyst formation rate(0.62% vs.4.10%),the implantation rate(13.66% vs.30.28%),and the clinical pregnancy rate(26.67% vs.51.55%)were all significantly lower(P0.05).In 135 FET cycles of non-top quality embryo,322 embryos were transferred.The survival rate of 5Bembryos after thawing was significantly higher than that of 4Bembryos(100% vs.91.87%)(P0.05).The undeveloped embryo rate in 5Bembryo group was lower than that in 4Bembryo group(22.86% vs.32.53%),but there was no significant difference(P0.05).Conclusions:Age is one of risk factors for embryo quality and clinical outcome of assisted reproductive technology.Some non-top quality embryos have potential to develop further.It is worthy to freeze and transfer non-top quality embryos for the patients with few or no high quality embryos,which can improve the cumulative pregnancy rate,especially for 5Bembryos.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To analyze the clinical value of transferring frozen-thawed non-top quality embryo.Methods:The data of 346frozen-thawed embryo transfer(FET)cycles were analyzed retrospectively.All the cycles were divided into two groups according to the quality of Day-3embryo:top quality embryo group(202cycle)and non-top quality embryo groups(144cycles).The pregnancy and implantation rate and other affecting factors were compared between the two groups.The results of non-top quality embryos after thawed and cultured were observed.Results:The age of the women in the non-top quality embryo group was significantly higher than that of the top quality group [(32.08±4.39)vs.(30.48±4.23)years](P0.05).The undeveloped embryo rate in the non-top quality embryo group was significantly higher than that of the top embryo group(26.54% vs.15.52%),while the blastocyst formation rate(0.62% vs.4.10%),the implantation rate(13.66% vs.30.28%),and the clinical pregnancy rate(26.67% vs.51.55%)were all significantly lower(P0.05).In 135 FET cycles of non-top quality embryo,322 embryos were transferred.The survival rate of 5Bembryos after thawing was significantly higher than that of 4Bembryos(100% vs.91.87%)(P0.05).The undeveloped embryo rate in 5Bembryo group was lower than that in 4Bembryo group(22.86% vs.32.53%),but there was no significant difference(P0.05).Conclusions:Age is one of risk factors for embryo quality and clinical outcome of assisted reproductive technology.Some non-top quality embryos have potential to develop further.It is worthy to freeze and transfer non-top quality embryos for the patients with few or no high quality embryos,which can improve the cumulative pregnancy rate,especially for 5Bembryos.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To analyze the clinical value of transferring frozen-thawed non-top quality embryo.Methods:The data of 346frozen-thawed embryo transfer(FET)cycles were analyzed retrospectively.All the cycles were divided into two groups according to the quality of Day-3embryo:top quality embryo group(202cycle)and non-top quality embryo groups(144cycles).The pregnancy and implantation rate and other affecting factors were compared between the two groups.The results of non-top quality embryos after thawed and cultured were observed.Results:The age of the women in the non-top quality embryo group was significantly higher than that of the top quality group [(32.08±4.39)vs.(30.48±4.23)years](P0.05).The undeveloped embryo rate in the non-top quality embryo group was significantly higher than that of the top embryo group(26.54% vs.15.52%),while the blastocyst formation rate(0.62% vs.4.10%),the implantation rate(13.66% vs.30.28%),and the clinical pregnancy rate(26.67% vs.51.55%)were all significantly lower(P0.05).In 135 FET cycles of non-top quality embryo,322 embryos were transferred.The survival rate of 5Bembryos after thawing was significantly higher than that of 4Bembryos(100% vs.91.87%)(P0.05).The undeveloped embryo rate in 5Bembryo group was lower than that in 4Bembryo group(22.86% vs.32.53%),but there was no significant difference(P0.05).Conclusions:Age is one of risk factors for embryo quality and clinical outcome of assisted reproductive technology.Some non-top quality embryos have potential to develop further.It is worthy to freeze and transfer non-top quality embryos for the patients with few or no high quality embryos,which can improve the cumulative pregnancy rate,especially for 5Bembryos.

Key concepts: Embryo, Embryo quality, Medicine, Embryo transfer, Blastocyst, Pregnancy rate, Andrology, Pregnancy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical value of transferring frozen-thawed Day-3 non-top quality embryo — Research Paper | ScholarLens