2007The Journal of Medical Theory and PracticeRequires access

Study of No-machine Oral Intubation in Patients during General Anesthesia

Min Zhao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the no-machine oral intubation in patients during general anesthesia.Methods:Sixty ASA I~II patients(aged 25~75 yrs) under general anesthesia were randomly divided into 2 groups(n=30 each) group I(no-machine oral intubation group)and group II(classic intubation group).The time of intubation,first success rate and cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation were recorded.Results:All cases were successful in intubation.The time of intubation in group I was reduced compared with group II.SBP,DBP and MAP were significantly higher immediately after intubation than that immediately after induction in the 2 groups.SBP was significantly lower in group I and higher in group II immediately after intubation than that immediately after induction.There was no significant difference in complications between the 2 groups.Conclusion:The no-machine oral intubation is a better way for airway management.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To evaluate the no-machine oral intubation in patients during general anesthesia.Methods:Sixty ASA I~II patients(aged 25~75 yrs) under general anesthesia were randomly divided into 2 groups(n=30 each) group I(no-machine oral intubation group)and group II(classic intubation group).The time of intubation,first success rate and cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation were recorded.Results:All cases were successful in intubation.The time of intubation in group I was reduced compared with group II.SBP,DBP and MAP were significantly higher immediately after intubation than that immediately after induction in the 2 groups.SBP was significantly lower in group I and higher in group II immediately after intubation than that immediately after induction.There was no significant difference in complications between the 2 groups.Conclusion:The no-machine oral intubation is a better way for airway management.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To evaluate the no-machine oral intubation in patients during general anesthesia.Methods:Sixty ASA I~II patients(aged 25~75 yrs) under general anesthesia were randomly divided into 2 groups(n=30 each) group I(no-machine oral intubation group)and group II(classic intubation group).The time of intubation,first success rate and cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation were recorded.Results:All cases were successful in intubation.The time of intubation in group I was reduced compared with group II.SBP,DBP and MAP were significantly higher immediately after intubation than that immediately after induction in the 2 groups.SBP was significantly lower in group I and higher in group II immediately after intubation than that immediately after induction.There was no significant difference in complications between the 2 groups.Conclusion:The no-machine oral intubation is a better way for airway management.

Key concepts: Medicine, Intubation, Anesthesia, Tracheal intubation, Airway, Significant difference, Airway management, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study of No-machine Oral Intubation in Patients during General Anesthesia — Research Paper | ScholarLens