2010•Shixue yuekanRequires access

Re-evaluating the Diplomatic Activity of Qi Ying

LI Shao-jun

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In recent years,some academics think that the diplomatic activity of Qi Ying is successful,but this view is in-correct.By analyzed the historical fact,we can make a conclusion that in the last period of Opium War,Qi Ying advocated the Qing government should surrender to the Britain,and he must take responsibility for the Sino-British Treaty of Nanking,his diplomatic activity is belong to treason.After this war,although he was the important mastermind and executor about the external policy in Qing government,his diplomatic standpoint was not changed.Some academics ap-prove his behavior in the negotiation of Sino-British customs tariff;think that he held the stand of the ban on opiumsmoking,regain the lost Zhoushan cleverly,and handled conflict intelligently.All of this view is not correct;the diplomatic activity of Qi Ying was just followed the bad habit of passive to the foreign.He never had the courage to break the traditional idea,or learn from the enemy.The view which believed Qi Ying was open-minded and equitable is no ba-sis in fact.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In recent years,some academics think that the diplomatic activity of Qi Ying is successful,but this view is in-correct.By analyzed the historical fact,we can make a conclusion that in the last period of Opium War,Qi Ying advocated the Qing government should surrender to the Britain,and he must take responsibility for the Sino-British Treaty of Nanking,his diplomatic activity is belong to treason.After this war,although he was the important mastermind and executor about the external policy in Qing government,his diplomatic standpoint was not changed.Some academics ap-prove his behavior in the negotiation of Sino-British customs tariff;think that he held the stand of the ban on opiumsmoking,regain the lost Zhoushan cleverly,and handled conflict intelligently.All of this view is not correct;the diplomatic activity of Qi Ying was just followed the bad habit of passive to the foreign.He never had the courage to break the traditional idea,or learn from the enemy.The view which believed Qi Ying was open-minded and equitable is no ba-sis in fact.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In recent years,some academics think that the diplomatic activity of Qi Ying is successful,but this view is in-correct.By analyzed the historical fact,we can make a conclusion that in the last period of Opium War,Qi Ying advocated the Qing government should surrender to the Britain,and he must take responsibility for the Sino-British Treaty of Nanking,his diplomatic activity is belong to treason.After this war,although he was the important mastermind and executor about the external policy in Qing government,his diplomatic standpoint was not changed.Some academics ap-prove his behavior in the negotiation of Sino-British customs tariff;think that he held the stand of the ban on opiumsmoking,regain the lost Zhoushan cleverly,and handled conflict intelligently.All of this view is not correct;the diplomatic activity of Qi Ying was just followed the bad habit of passive to the foreign.He never had the courage to break the traditional idea,or learn from the enemy.The view which believed Qi Ying was open-minded and equitable is no ba-sis in fact.

Key concepts: Surrender, Negotiation, Executor, Law, Courage, Treaty, Government (linguistics), Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Re-evaluating the Diplomatic Activity of Qi Ying — Research Paper | ScholarLens