Analysis on Reliability and Validity of TCM Syndrome Questionnaire of primary Osteoporosis
Jia Yu
Abstract
Jia Yu
Abstract
Objective To evaluate reliability and validity to perfect the syndrome questionnaire of osteoporosis. Methods The reliability was evaluated with Cronbach alpha and Guttman Split-half, the construct and content validity of the questionnaire was evaluated with factor analysis. Results The Cronbach alpha is from 0.365 4 to 0.852 5. The Guttman Split-half is from 0.542 9 to 0.746 5. The factor analysis had extracted 12 common factors which initial eigenvalues bigger than one. The Cumulative Proportion is 66.24%. The factors cover all the main facets of the questionnaire. Conclusion The questionnaire has its reliability and validity, and should be revised and perfected in future study.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To evaluate reliability and validity to perfect the syndrome questionnaire of osteoporosis. Methods The reliability was evaluated with Cronbach alpha and Guttman Split-half, the construct and content validity of the questionnaire was evaluated with factor analysis. Results The Cronbach alpha is from 0.365 4 to 0.852 5. The Guttman Split-half is from 0.542 9 to 0.746 5. The factor analysis had extracted 12 common factors which initial eigenvalues bigger than one. The Cumulative Proportion is 66.24%. The factors cover all the main facets of the questionnaire. Conclusion The questionnaire has its reliability and validity, and should be revised and perfected in future study.
Key concepts: Guttman scale, Cronbach's alpha, Reliability (semiconductor), Construct validity, Psychology, Validity, Exploratory factor analysis, Clinical psychology