On the Legal Position of the Act of Right in Rem
LI Xue-la
Abstract
LI Xue-la
Abstract
Based on the differences between the act of right in rein and the act of creditors right, it is argued that the former should exist independently and it should not be included in the latter. Yet they both form the basis of the legal act and each is an indispensable part of the civil law system. The act in Rem is both theoretically and practically necessary in building and perfecting the law system in China.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Based on the differences between the act of right in rein and the act of creditors right, it is argued that the former should exist independently and it should not be included in the latter. Yet they both form the basis of the legal act and each is an indispensable part of the civil law system. The act in Rem is both theoretically and practically necessary in building and perfecting the law system in China.
Key concepts: Creditor, Position (finance), Law, China, Political science, Law and economics, Business, Sociology