2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Controversy over the Rite of Princes' Audience With Emperor in the Study of Spring and Autumn Annals in the Han Dynasty

Gao Ji-yi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Controversy over rites has been a very important issue in the arguments between the contemporary scripture school and the ancient scripture school in the Han Dynasty. The different interpretations of Spring and Autumn Annals in Commentary of Gongyang and The Tradition of Zuo are actually resulted from the different understanding of the ancient ritual system. In the case of princes' audience with emperor, Commentary of Gongyang and The Tradition of Zuo differ in the interpretaions of such issues as fief, manor estate, etc. Thus, a good understanding of the ritual studies in the Han Dynasty benefits the interpretation of Spring and Autumn Annals, while an acquaintance with the study of Spring and Autumn Annals in the Han Dynasty enhances the understanding of the ancient rite system. The inter-relationship of the two proves that a characteristic feature of classics study in the Han Dynasty is mutual corroboration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Controversy over rites has been a very important issue in the arguments between the contemporary scripture school and the ancient scripture school in the Han Dynasty. The different interpretations of Spring and Autumn Annals in Commentary of Gongyang and The Tradition of Zuo are actually resulted from the different understanding of the ancient ritual system. In the case of princes' audience with emperor, Commentary of Gongyang and The Tradition of Zuo differ in the interpretaions of such issues as fief, manor estate, etc. Thus, a good understanding of the ritual studies in the Han Dynasty benefits the interpretation of Spring and Autumn Annals, while an acquaintance with the study of Spring and Autumn Annals in the Han Dynasty enhances the understanding of the ancient rite system. The inter-relationship of the two proves that a characteristic feature of classics study in the Han Dynasty is mutual corroboration.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Controversy over rites has been a very important issue in the arguments between the contemporary scripture school and the ancient scripture school in the Han Dynasty. The different interpretations of Spring and Autumn Annals in Commentary of Gongyang and The Tradition of Zuo are actually resulted from the different understanding of the ancient ritual system. In the case of princes' audience with emperor, Commentary of Gongyang and The Tradition of Zuo differ in the interpretaions of such issues as fief, manor estate, etc. Thus, a good understanding of the ritual studies in the Han Dynasty benefits the interpretation of Spring and Autumn Annals, while an acquaintance with the study of Spring and Autumn Annals in the Han Dynasty enhances the understanding of the ancient rite system. The inter-relationship of the two proves that a characteristic feature of classics study in the Han Dynasty is mutual corroboration.

Key concepts: Annals, Emperor, Rite, Ancient history, Spring (device), History, Classics, Interpretation (philosophy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Controversy over the Rite of Princes' Audience With Emperor in the Study of Spring and Autumn Annals in the Han Dynasty — Research Paper | ScholarLens