2004Journal of Liaocheng UniversityRequires access

A Comment on The Spring and Autumn Annals and Zuo Zhuan

Wang Shi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The case that Confucius wrote The Spring and Autumn Annals was recorded in a way of stressing the main points and in detail in four sections of Records of the Grand Historian. It is not difficult to find out that to Si Ma- qian's mind The Spring and Autumn Annals written by Confucius is not The Original of the Spring and Autumn Annals , but the Confucius' Records of the Grand Historian, i.e. Confucius' Spring and Autumn Annals on condition that we analyze these records with the data concerned. The case of Zuo Qiu - ruing's commenting on The Spring and Autumn Annals can't be found in the records of the Pre - Qin era and have no grounds in the history. It was fabricated by the Confucians in Han Dynasty specially the Gong Yang School and so unbelievable. The textual criticism of The Textual Criticism of the Spring and Autumn Annals can withstand the examine. Its academic value and contribution should be respected and affirmed while the attitude of blindly obliterating them is unreliable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The case that Confucius wrote The Spring and Autumn Annals was recorded in a way of stressing the main points and in detail in four sections of Records of the Grand Historian. It is not difficult to find out that to Si Ma- qian's mind The Spring and Autumn Annals written by Confucius is not The Original of the Spring and Autumn Annals , but the Confucius' Records of the Grand Historian, i.e. Confucius' Spring and Autumn Annals on condition that we analyze these records with the data concerned. The case of Zuo Qiu - ruing's commenting on The Spring and Autumn Annals can't be found in the records of the Pre - Qin era and have no grounds in the history. It was fabricated by the Confucians in Han Dynasty specially the Gong Yang School and so unbelievable. The textual criticism of The Textual Criticism of the Spring and Autumn Annals can withstand the examine. Its academic value and contribution should be respected and affirmed while the attitude of blindly obliterating them is unreliable.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The case that Confucius wrote The Spring and Autumn Annals was recorded in a way of stressing the main points and in detail in four sections of Records of the Grand Historian. It is not difficult to find out that to Si Ma- qian's mind The Spring and Autumn Annals written by Confucius is not The Original of the Spring and Autumn Annals , but the Confucius' Records of the Grand Historian, i.e. Confucius' Spring and Autumn Annals on condition that we analyze these records with the data concerned. The case of Zuo Qiu - ruing's commenting on The Spring and Autumn Annals can't be found in the records of the Pre - Qin era and have no grounds in the history. It was fabricated by the Confucians in Han Dynasty specially the Gong Yang School and so unbelievable. The textual criticism of The Textual Criticism of the Spring and Autumn Annals can withstand the examine. Its academic value and contribution should be respected and affirmed while the attitude of blindly obliterating them is unreliable.

Key concepts: Annals, Spring (device), Criticism, Spring and Autumn period, Classics, History, Philosophy, Literature

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comment on The Spring and Autumn Annals and Zuo Zhuan — Research Paper | ScholarLens